Examples with TheoryTestingSupport com.sri.ai.grinder.tester.TheoryTestingSupport used on opensource projects

Example 26 with TheoryTestingSupport

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.tester.TheoryTestingSupport in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class EvaluationTest method testEvaluationOfCardinalityExpressions.

@Test
public void testEvaluationOfCardinalityExpressions() {
    TheoryTestingSupport theoryTestingSupport = TheoryTestingSupport.make(makeRandom(), new CompoundTheory(new EqualityTheory(false, true), new DifferenceArithmeticTheory(false, true), new PropositionalTheory()));
    Map<String, Type> variablesAndTypes = new LinkedHashMap<>(theoryTestingSupport.getVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting());
    Type booleanType = variablesAndTypes.get("P");
    variablesAndTypes.put("S", booleanType);
    variablesAndTypes.put("T", booleanType);
    variablesAndTypes.put("U", booleanType);
    theoryTestingSupport.setVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting(variablesAndTypes);
    Context context = theoryTestingSupport.makeContextWithTestingInformation();
    String expressionString;
    Expression expected;
    expressionString = "| {{ (on I in 1..10) 3 : I != 4 and P }} |";
    expected = parse("if P then 9 else 0");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "| I in 1..10 : I != 4 and P |";
    expected = parse("if P then 9 else 0");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "| {{ (on ) 3 : I != 4 and P }} |";
    expected = parse("if I != 4 then if P then 1 else 0 else 0");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "| : I != 4 and P |";
    expected = parse("if I != 4 then if P then 1 else 0 else 0");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "| {{ (on ) 3 : P and not P }} |";
    expected = parse("0");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "| : P and not P |";
    expected = parse("0");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "| {{ (on I in 1..10, J in 1..2) 3 : I != 4 }} |";
    expected = parse("18");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "| I in 1..10, J in 1..2 : I != 4 |";
    expected = parse("18");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "| {{ (on I in 1..10, P in Boolean) 3 : I != 4 }} |";
    expected = parse("18");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "| I in 1..10, P in Boolean: I != 4 |";
    expected = parse("18");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
}

Example 27 with TheoryTestingSupport

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.tester.TheoryTestingSupport in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class EvaluationTest method testEvaluationOfQuantifiedExpressions.

@Test
public void testEvaluationOfQuantifiedExpressions() {
    TheoryTestingSupport theoryTestingSupport = TheoryTestingSupport.make(makeRandom(), new CompoundTheory(new EqualityTheory(false, true), new DifferenceArithmeticTheory(false, true), new PropositionalTheory()));
    Map<String, Type> variablesAndTypes = new LinkedHashMap<>(theoryTestingSupport.getVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting());
    Type booleanType = variablesAndTypes.get("P");
    variablesAndTypes.put("S", booleanType);
    variablesAndTypes.put("T", booleanType);
    variablesAndTypes.put("U", booleanType);
    theoryTestingSupport.setVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting(variablesAndTypes);
    Context context = theoryTestingSupport.makeContextWithTestingInformation();
    String expressionString;
    Expression expected;
    expressionString = "for all I in 1..10 : (I != 4 or I = 4) and P";
    expected = parse("P");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    // the following example tests that quantified expressions that are function arguments get evaluated properly, as there once was a bug preventing it
    expressionString = "not(for all I in 1..10 : (I != 4 or I = 4))";
    expected = parse("false");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "for all I in 1..10 : for all J in 1..2 : I != 4";
    expected = parse("false");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "for all I in 1..10 : for all P in Boolean : I != 4 or I = 4 and (P or not P)";
    expected = parse("true");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "there exists I in 1..10 : I != 4 and P";
    expected = parse("P");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "there exists I in 1..10 : there exists J in 1..2 : I != 4 and J != 1";
    expected = parse("true");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "there exists I in 1..10 : there exists P in Boolean : I != 4 and P";
    expected = parse("true");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
}

Example 28 with TheoryTestingSupport

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.tester.TheoryTestingSupport in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class EvaluationTest method testEvaluationOfGroupOperationsOnSets.

@Test
public void testEvaluationOfGroupOperationsOnSets() {
    TheoryTestingSupport theoryTestingSupport = TheoryTestingSupport.make(makeRandom(), new CompoundTheory(new EqualityTheory(false, true), new DifferenceArithmeticTheory(false, true), new PropositionalTheory()));
    Map<String, Type> variablesAndTypes = new LinkedHashMap<>(theoryTestingSupport.getVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting());
    Type booleanType = variablesAndTypes.get("P");
    variablesAndTypes.put("S", booleanType);
    variablesAndTypes.put("T", booleanType);
    variablesAndTypes.put("U", booleanType);
    theoryTestingSupport.setVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting(variablesAndTypes);
    Context context = theoryTestingSupport.makeContextWithTestingInformation();
    String expressionString;
    Expression expected;
    expressionString = "sum( {{ (on I in 1..10) 3 : I != 4 and P }} )";
    expected = parse("if P then 27 else 0");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "sum( {{ (on ) 3 : I != 4 and P }} )";
    expected = parse("if I != 4 then if P then 3 else 0 else 0");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "sum( {{ (on ) 3 : P and not P }} )";
    expected = parse("0");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "sum( {{ (on I in 1..10, J in 1..2) 3 : I != 4 }} )";
    expected = parse("54");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "sum( {{ (on I in 1..10, P in Boolean) 3 : I != 4 }} )";
    expected = parse("54");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "max( {{ (on I in 1..10) 3 : I != 4 and P }} )";
    expected = parse("if P then 3 else -infinity");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "max( {{ (on ) 3 : I != 4 and P }} )";
    expected = parse("if I != 4 then if P then 3 else -infinity else -infinity");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "max( {{ (on ) 3 : P and not P }} )";
    expected = parse("-infinity");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "max( {{ (on I in 1..10, J in 1..2) 3 : I != 4 }} )";
    expected = parse("3");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "max( {{ (on I in 1..10, P in Boolean) 3 : I != 4 }} )";
    expected = parse("3");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
}

Example 29 with TheoryTestingSupport

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.tester.TheoryTestingSupport in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class UnificationStepSolverTest method propositionalTest.

@Test
public void propositionalTest() {
    TheoryTestingSupport theoryTestingSupport = TheoryTestingSupport.make(seededRandom, new PropositionalTheory());
    // NOTE: passing explicit FunctionTypes will prevent the general variables' argument types being randomly changed.
    theoryTestingSupport.setVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting(map("P", BOOLEAN_TYPE, "Q", BOOLEAN_TYPE, "R", BOOLEAN_TYPE, "unary_prop/1", new FunctionType(BOOLEAN_TYPE, BOOLEAN_TYPE), "binary_prop/2", new FunctionType(BOOLEAN_TYPE, BOOLEAN_TYPE, BOOLEAN_TYPE)));
    Context rootContext = theoryTestingSupport.makeContextWithTestingInformation();
    UnificationStepSolver unificationStepSolver = new UnificationStepSolver(parse("unary_prop(P)"), parse("unary_prop(P)"));
    StepSolver.Step<Boolean> step = unificationStepSolver.step(rootContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getValue());
    unificationStepSolver = new UnificationStepSolver(parse("unary_prop(P)"), parse("unary_prop(Q)"));
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(rootContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(Expressions.parse("P = Q"), step.getSplitter());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsTrue().step(rootContext).itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsTrue().step(rootContext).getValue());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsFalse().step(rootContext).itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsFalse().step(rootContext).getValue());
    Context localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("P and not Q"), rootContext);
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getValue());
    unificationStepSolver = new UnificationStepSolver(parse("unary_prop(P)"), parse("unary_prop(true)"));
    localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("P"), rootContext);
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getValue());
    localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("not P"), rootContext);
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getValue());
    unificationStepSolver = new UnificationStepSolver(parse("binary_prop(P, unary_prop(P))"), parse("binary_prop(unary_prop(Q), Q)"));
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(rootContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(Expressions.parse("P = unary_prop(Q)"), step.getSplitter());
    // Ignore: PropositionalTheory will only deal with symbol variables for now
    // localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("not P and Q and not unary_prop(Q) and unary_prop(P)"), rootContext);
    // step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    // Assert.assertEquals(false,  step.itDepends());
    // Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getValue());
    // localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("P and Q and not unary_prop(Q) and unary_prop(P)"), rootContext);
    // step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    // Assert.assertEquals(false,  step.itDepends());
    // Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getValue());
    // Now test out individual branches
    unificationStepSolver = new UnificationStepSolver(parse("binary_prop(P, unary_prop(P))"), parse("binary_prop(unary_prop(Q), Q)"));
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(rootContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(parse("P = unary_prop(Q)"), step.getSplitter());
    StepSolver<Boolean> falseItDependsSolver = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsFalse();
    Assert.assertEquals(false, falseItDependsSolver.step(rootContext).itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, falseItDependsSolver.step(rootContext).getValue());
    StepSolver<Boolean> trueItDependsSolver = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsTrue();
    localTestContext = rootContext.conjoin(parse("P"), rootContext);
    step = trueItDependsSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(parse("P = unary_prop(Q)"), step.getSplitter());
    falseItDependsSolver = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsFalse();
    Assert.assertEquals(false, falseItDependsSolver.step(rootContext).itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, falseItDependsSolver.step(rootContext).getValue());
    // Ignore: PropositionalTheory will only deal with symbol variables for now
    // localTestContext = localTestContext.conjoin(parse("unary_prop(Q)"), localTestContext);
    // step = trueItDependsSolver.step(localTestContext);
    // Assert.assertEquals(true,  step.itDepends());
    // Assert.assertEquals(parse("unary_prop(P) = Q"), step.getSplitter());
    falseItDependsSolver = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsFalse();
    Assert.assertEquals(false, falseItDependsSolver.step(rootContext).itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, falseItDependsSolver.step(rootContext).getValue());
    // Ignore: PropositionalTheory will only deal with symbol variables for now
    // localTestContext = localTestContext.conjoin(parse("unary_prop(P)"), localTestContext);
    // step = trueItDependsSolver.step(localTestContext);
    // Assert.assertEquals(true,  step.itDepends());
    // Assert.assertEquals(parse("unary_prop(P) = Q"), step.getSplitter());
    falseItDependsSolver = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsFalse();
    Assert.assertEquals(false, falseItDependsSolver.step(rootContext).itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, falseItDependsSolver.step(rootContext).getValue());
// Ignore: PropositionalTheory will only deal with symbol variables for now
// localTestContext = localTestContext.conjoin(parse("Q"), localTestContext);
// step = trueItDependsSolver.step(localTestContext);
// Assert.assertEquals(false,  step.itDepends());
// Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getValue());
}

Example 30 with TheoryTestingSupport

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.tester.TheoryTestingSupport in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class UnificationStepSolverTest method advancedEqualityTest.

@Ignore("TODO - context implementation currently does not support these more advanced/indirect comparisons")
@Test
public void advancedEqualityTest() {
    TheoryTestingSupport theoryTestingSupport = TheoryTestingSupport.make(seededRandom, new EqualityTheory(false, true));
    // NOTE: passing explicit FunctionTypes will prevent the general variables' argument types being randomly changed.
    theoryTestingSupport.setVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting(map("X", TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, "Y", TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, "Z", TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, "unary_eq/1", new FunctionType(TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE), "binary_eq/2", new FunctionType(TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE)));
    Context rootContext = theoryTestingSupport.makeContextWithTestingInformation();
    UnificationStepSolver unificationStepSolver = new UnificationStepSolver(parse("binary_eq(X, unary_eq(X))"), parse("binary_eq(unary_eq(Y), Y)"));
    Context localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("X = b and Y = a and unary_eq(Y) = b and unary_eq(X) = a"), rootContext);
    StepSolver.Step<Boolean> step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getValue());
    localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("X = a and Y = a and unary_eq(Y) = b and unary_eq(X) = a"), rootContext);
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getValue());
    localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("X = b and Y = a and unary_eq(a) = b and unary_eq(b) = a"), rootContext);
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getValue());
}