Examples with DifferenceArithmeticTheory com.sri.ai.grinder.theory.differencearithmetic.DifferenceArithmeticTheory used on opensource projects

Example 16 with DifferenceArithmeticTheory

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.theory.differencearithmetic.DifferenceArithmeticTheory in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class EvaluationTest method testEvaluationOfFunctionApplications.

@Test
public void testEvaluationOfFunctionApplications() {
    TheoryTestingSupport theoryTestingSupport = TheoryTestingSupport.make(makeRandom(), new CompoundTheory(new EqualityTheory(false, true), new DifferenceArithmeticTheory(false, true), new PropositionalTheory()));
    Map<String, Type> variablesAndTypes = new LinkedHashMap<>(theoryTestingSupport.getVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting());
    Type booleanType = variablesAndTypes.get("P");
    variablesAndTypes.put("S", booleanType);
    variablesAndTypes.put("T", booleanType);
    variablesAndTypes.put("U", booleanType);
    theoryTestingSupport.setVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting(variablesAndTypes);
    Context context = theoryTestingSupport.makeContextWithTestingInformation();
    String expressionString;
    Expression expected;
    expressionString = "0";
    expected = parse("0");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "I > J";
    expected = parse("I > J");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "I > J and I < J";
    expected = parse("false");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "(if I > J then 1 else 2) + (if I <= J then 30 else 40)";
    expected = parse("if I > J then 41 else 32");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "(if I > J then 1 else 2) + (if I <= J then 3 else 4)";
    expected = parse("5");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "(if I > J then if P or Q then 1 else 2 else 5) + (if I <= J then 3 else if not Q then 4 else -3)";
    expected = parse("if I > J then if P then if not Q then 5 else -2 else if Q then -2 else 6 else 8");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "(if I > J then if P or X = a or Y != b then 1 else 2 else 5) + (if I <= J then 3 else if not (X != a or Y = c and Q) then 4 else -3)";
    expected = parse("if I > J then if P then if X != a then -2 else if Y = c then if Q then -2 else 5 else 5 else if X = a then if Y = c then if Q then -2 else 5 else 5 else if Y != b then -2 else -1 else 8");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "if P and Q and R then 1 else 0";
    expected = parse("if P then if Q then if R then 1 else 0 else 0 else 0");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
    expressionString = "if P and Q and R and S and T and U then 1 else 0";
    expected = parse("if P then if Q then if R then if S then if T then if U then 1 else 0 else 0 else 0 else 0 else 0 else 0");
    runTest(expressionString, expected, context);
}

Example 17 with DifferenceArithmeticTheory

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.theory.differencearithmetic.DifferenceArithmeticTheory in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class UnificationStepSolverTest method advancedCompositeTest.

@Ignore("TODO - context implementation currently does not support these more advanced/indirect comparisons")
@Test
public void advancedCompositeTest() {
    TheoryTestingSupport theoryTestingSupport = TheoryTestingSupport.make(seededRandom, new CompoundTheory(new EqualityTheory(false, true), new DifferenceArithmeticTheory(false, true), new LinearRealArithmeticTheory(false, true), new PropositionalTheory()));
    // NOTE: passing explicit FunctionTypes will prevent the general variables' argument types being randomly changed.
    theoryTestingSupport.setVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting(map("P", BOOLEAN_TYPE, "Q", BOOLEAN_TYPE, "R", BOOLEAN_TYPE, "unary_prop/1", new FunctionType(BOOLEAN_TYPE, BOOLEAN_TYPE), "binary_prop/2", new FunctionType(BOOLEAN_TYPE, BOOLEAN_TYPE, BOOLEAN_TYPE), "S", TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, "T", TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, "U", TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, "unary_eq/1", new FunctionType(TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE), "binary_eq/2", new FunctionType(TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE), "I", TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, "J", TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, "K", TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, "unary_dar/1", new FunctionType(TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE), "binary_dar/2", new FunctionType(TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE), "X", TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE, "Y", TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE, "Z", TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE, "unary_lra/1", new FunctionType(TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE), "binary_lra/2", new FunctionType(TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE)));
    Context rootContext = theoryTestingSupport.makeContextWithTestingInformation();
    UnificationStepSolver unificationStepSolver = new UnificationStepSolver(parse("binary_prop(P, unary_prop(P))"), parse("binary_prop(unary_prop(Q), Q)"));
    Context localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("not P and Q and not unary_prop(Q) and unary_prop(P)"), rootContext);
    StepSolver.Step<Boolean> step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getValue());
    localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("P and Q and not unary_prop(Q) and unary_prop(P)"), rootContext);
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getValue());
}

Example 18 with DifferenceArithmeticTheory

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.theory.differencearithmetic.DifferenceArithmeticTheory in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class UnificationStepSolverTest method advancedDifferenceArithmeticTest.

@Ignore("TODO - context implementation currently does not support these more advanced/indirect comparisons")
@Test
public void advancedDifferenceArithmeticTest() {
    TheoryTestingSupport theoryTestingSupport = TheoryTestingSupport.make(seededRandom, new DifferenceArithmeticTheory(true, true));
    // NOTE: passing explicit FunctionTypes will prevent the general variables' argument types being randomly changed.
    theoryTestingSupport.setVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting(map("I", TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, "J", TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, "K", TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, "unary_dar/1", new FunctionType(TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE), "binary_dar/2", new FunctionType(TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE)));
    Context rootContext = theoryTestingSupport.makeContextWithTestingInformation();
    UnificationStepSolver unificationStepSolver = new UnificationStepSolver(parse("binary_dar(I, unary_dar(I))"), parse("binary_dar(unary_dar(J), J)"));
    Context localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("I = 0 and J = 1 and unary_dar(J) = 0 and unary_dar(I) = 1"), rootContext);
    StepSolver.Step<Boolean> step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getValue());
    localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("I = 1 and J = 1 and unary_dar(J) = 0 and unary_dar(I) = 1"), rootContext);
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getValue());
    localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("I = 0 and J = 1 and unary_dar(1) = 0 and unary_dar(0) = 1"), rootContext);
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getValue());
}

Example 19 with DifferenceArithmeticTheory

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.theory.differencearithmetic.DifferenceArithmeticTheory in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class BasicTest method debug.

public void debug(Expression problem, Expression expectedSolution) {
    CompoundTheory theory = new CompoundTheory(new EqualityTheory(false, true), new DifferenceArithmeticTheory(false, false), new LinearRealArithmeticTheory(false, false), new TupleTheory(), new PropositionalTheory(), new BruteForceFunctionTheory());
    Context context = new TrueContext(theory);
    context = context.makeNewContextWithAddedType(BOOLEAN_TYPE);
    context = context.makeCloneWithAdditionalRegisteredSymbolsAndTypes(map(makeSymbol("P"), makeSymbol("Boolean")));
    Expression symbolicSolution = theory.evaluate(problem, context);
    println(symbolicSolution);
    Assert.assertEquals(expectedSolution, symbolicSolution);
}

Example 20 with DifferenceArithmeticTheory

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.theory.differencearithmetic.DifferenceArithmeticTheory in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class CompoundTheoryWithDifferenceArithmeticTest method makeTheoryTestingSupport.

@Override
protected TheoryTestingSupport makeTheoryTestingSupport() {
    TheoryTestingSupport result = TheoryTestingSupport.make(makeRandom(), new CompoundTheory(new EqualityTheory(false, true), new DifferenceArithmeticTheory(false, true), new PropositionalTheory()));
    // using different testing variables and types to test distribution of testing information
    // to sub constraint theories.
    Categorical booleanType = BOOLEAN_TYPE;
    Categorical dogsType = new Categorical("Dogs", 4, arrayList(parse("fido"), parse("rex")));
    IntegerInterval oneTwoThree = new IntegerInterval(1, 3);
    Map<String, Type> variablesAndTypes = map("F", booleanType, "G", booleanType, "R", dogsType, "S", dogsType, "T", oneTwoThree, "U", oneTwoThree);
    result.setVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting(variablesAndTypes);
    return result;
}