use of com.dat3m.dartagnan.utils.logic.Conjunction in project Dat3M by hernanponcedeleon.
the class Reasoner method computeViolationReasons.
// ========================== Reason computation ==========================
public DNF<CAATLiteral> computeViolationReasons(Constraint constraint) {
if (!constraint.checkForViolations()) {
return DNF.FALSE();
}
CAATPredicate pred = constraint.getConstrainedPredicate();
Collection<? extends Collection<? extends Derivable>> violations = constraint.getViolations();
List<Conjunction<CAATLiteral>> reasonList = new ArrayList<>(violations.size());
if (constraint instanceof AcyclicityConstraint) {
// For acyclicity constraints, it is likely that we encounter the same
// edge multiple times (as it can be part of different cycles)
// so we memoize the computed reasons and reuse them if possible.
final RelationGraph constrainedGraph = (RelationGraph) pred;
final int mapSize = violations.stream().mapToInt(Collection::size).sum() * 4 / 3;
final Map<Edge, Conjunction<CAATLiteral>> reasonMap = new HashMap<>(mapSize);
for (Collection<Edge> violation : (Collection<Collection<Edge>>) violations) {
Conjunction<CAATLiteral> reason = violation.stream().map(edge -> reasonMap.computeIfAbsent(edge, key -> computeReason(constrainedGraph, key))).reduce(Conjunction.TRUE(), Conjunction::and);
reasonList.add(reason);
}
} else {
for (Collection<? extends Derivable> violation : violations) {
Conjunction<CAATLiteral> reason = violation.stream().map(edge -> computeReason(pred, edge)).reduce(Conjunction.TRUE(), Conjunction::and);
reasonList.add(reason);
}
}
return new DNF<>(reasonList);
}
use of com.dat3m.dartagnan.utils.logic.Conjunction in project Dat3M by hernanponcedeleon.
the class CAATSolver method computeInconsistencyReasons.
// ======================================== Reason computation ==============================================
private DNF<CAATLiteral> computeInconsistencyReasons(List<Constraint> violatedConstraints) {
List<Conjunction<CAATLiteral>> reasons = new ArrayList<>();
for (Constraint constraint : violatedConstraints) {
reasons.addAll(reasoner.computeViolationReasons(constraint).getCubes());
}
stats.numComputedReasons += reasons.size();
// The conversion to DNF removes duplicates and dominated clauses
DNF<CAATLiteral> result = new DNF<>(reasons);
stats.numComputedReducedReasons += result.getNumberOfCubes();
return result;
}
use of com.dat3m.dartagnan.utils.logic.Conjunction in project Dat3M by hernanponcedeleon.
the class Refiner method refine.
// This method computes a refinement clause from a set of violations.
// Furthermore, it computes symmetric violations if symmetry learning is enabled.
public BooleanFormula refine(DNF<CoreLiteral> coreReasons, SolverContext context) {
// TODO: A specialized algorithm that computes the orbit under permutation may be better,
// since most violations involve only few threads and hence the orbit is far smaller than the full
// set of permutations.
BooleanFormulaManager bmgr = context.getFormulaManager().getBooleanFormulaManager();
BooleanFormula refinement = bmgr.makeTrue();
// For each symmetry permutation, we will create refinement clauses
for (Function<Event, Event> perm : symmPermutations) {
for (Conjunction<CoreLiteral> reason : coreReasons.getCubes()) {
BooleanFormula permutedClause = reason.getLiterals().stream().map(lit -> bmgr.not(permuteAndConvert(lit, perm, context))).reduce(bmgr.makeFalse(), bmgr::or);
refinement = bmgr.and(refinement, permutedClause);
}
}
return refinement;
}
use of com.dat3m.dartagnan.utils.logic.Conjunction in project Dat3M by hernanponcedeleon.
the class CoreReasoner method toCoreReason.
public Conjunction<CoreLiteral> toCoreReason(Conjunction<CAATLiteral> baseReason) {
RelationRepository repo = memoryModel.getRelationRepository();
EventDomain domain = executionGraph.getDomain();
List<CoreLiteral> coreReason = new ArrayList<>(baseReason.getSize());
for (CAATLiteral lit : baseReason.getLiterals()) {
if (lit instanceof ElementLiteral) {
Event e = domain.getObjectById(((ElementLiteral) lit).getElement().getId()).getEvent();
// We only have static tags, so all of them reduce to execution literals
coreReason.add(new ExecLiteral(e, lit.isNegative()));
} else {
EdgeLiteral edgeLit = (EdgeLiteral) lit;
Edge edge = edgeLit.getEdge();
Event e1 = domain.getObjectById(edge.getFirst()).getEvent();
Event e2 = domain.getObjectById(edge.getSecond()).getEvent();
Tuple tuple = new Tuple(e1, e2);
Relation rel = repo.getRelation(lit.getName());
if (lit.isPositive() && rel.getMinTupleSet().contains(tuple)) {
// Statically present edges
addExecReason(tuple, coreReason);
} else if (lit.isNegative() && !rel.getMaxTupleSet().contains(tuple)) {
// Statically absent edges
} else {
if (rel instanceof RelFencerel) {
// We should do this transformation directly on the Wmm to avoid this special reasoning
if (lit.isNegative()) {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException(String.format("FenceRel %s is not allowed on the rhs of differences.", rel));
}
addFenceReason(rel, edge, coreReason);
} else if (rel.getName().equals(LOC)) {
coreReason.add(new AddressLiteral(tuple, lit.isNegative()));
} else if (rel.getName().equals(RF) || rel.getName().equals(CO)) {
coreReason.add(new RelLiteral(rel.getName(), tuple, lit.isNegative()));
} else {
// TODO: Right now, we assume many relations like Data, Ctrl and Addr to be
// static.
addExecReason(tuple, coreReason);
}
}
}
}
minimize(coreReason);
return new Conjunction<>(coreReason);
}
Aggregations