use of com.mercedesbenz.sechub.domain.scan.project.FalsePositiveJobData in project sechub by mercedes-benz.
the class FalsePositiveRestControllerRestDocTest method restdoc_mark_false_positives_for_job.
@Test
@UseCaseRestDoc(useCase = UseCaseUserMarksFalsePositivesForJob.class)
public void restdoc_mark_false_positives_for_job() throws Exception {
/* prepare */
String apiEndpoint = https(PORT_USED).buildUserAddsFalsePositiveJobDataListForProject(PROJECT_ID.pathElement());
Class<? extends Annotation> useCase = UseCaseUserMarksFalsePositivesForJob.class;
FalsePositiveJobDataList jobDataList = new FalsePositiveJobDataList();
jobDataList.setApiVersion("1.0");
List<FalsePositiveJobData> list = jobDataList.getJobData();
FalsePositiveJobData data = new FalsePositiveJobData();
data.setComment("an optional comment why this is a false positive...");
data.setFindingId(42);
data.setJobUUID(UUID.fromString("f1d02a9d-5e1b-4f52-99e5-401854ccf936"));
list.add(data);
String content = jobDataList.toJSON();
/* execute + test @formatter:off */
this.mockMvc.perform(put(apiEndpoint, PROJECT1_ID).contentType(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE).content(content)).andExpect(status().isOk()).andDo(defineRestService().with().useCaseData(useCase).tag(RestDocFactory.extractTag(apiEndpoint)).requestSchema(OpenApiSchema.FALSE_POSITVES_FOR_JOB.getSchema()).and().document(requestFields(fieldWithPath(PROPERTY_API_VERSION).description("The api version, currently only 1.0 is supported"), fieldWithPath(PROPERTY_TYPE).description("The type of the json content. Currently only accepted value is '" + FalsePositiveJobDataList.ACCEPTED_TYPE + "'."), fieldWithPath(PROPERTY_JOBDATA).description("Job data list containing false positive setup based on former jobs"), fieldWithPath(PROPERTY_JOBDATA + "[]." + PROPERTY_JOBUUID).description("SecHub job uuid where finding was"), fieldWithPath(PROPERTY_JOBDATA + "[]." + PROPERTY_FINDINGID).description("SecHub finding identifier - identifies problem inside the job which shall be markeda as a false positive. *ATTENTION*: at the moment only code scan false positive handling is supported. Infra and web scan findings will lead to a non accepted error!"), fieldWithPath(PROPERTY_JOBDATA + "[]." + PROPERTY_COMMENT).optional().description("A comment describing why this is a false positive")), pathParameters(parameterWithName(PROJECT_ID.paramName()).description("The projectId of the project where users adds false positives for"))));
/* @formatter:on */
}
use of com.mercedesbenz.sechub.domain.scan.project.FalsePositiveJobData in project sechub by mercedes-benz.
the class SerecoFalsePositiveMarker method handleVulnereability.
private void handleVulnereability(List<FalsePositiveEntry> falsePositives, SerecoVulnerability vulnerability) {
for (FalsePositiveEntry entry : falsePositives) {
if (isFalsePositive(vulnerability, entry)) {
vulnerability.setFalsePositive(true);
FalsePositiveJobData jobData = entry.getJobData();
vulnerability.setFalsePositiveReason("finding:" + jobData.getFindingId() + " in job:" + jobData.getJobUUID() + " marked as false positive");
return;
}
}
}
use of com.mercedesbenz.sechub.domain.scan.project.FalsePositiveJobData in project sechub by mercedes-benz.
the class FalsePositiveRestControllerRestDocTest method user_fetches_false_positive_configuration.
@Test
@UseCaseRestDoc(useCase = UseCaseUserFetchesFalsePositiveConfigurationOfProject.class)
public void user_fetches_false_positive_configuration() throws Exception {
/* prepare */
String apiEndpoint = https(PORT_USED).buildUserFetchesFalsePositiveConfigurationOfProject(PROJECT_ID.pathElement());
Class<? extends Annotation> useCase = UseCaseUserFetchesFalsePositiveConfigurationOfProject.class;
int findingId = 42;
UUID jobUUID = UUID.fromString("f1d02a9d-5e1b-4f52-99e5-401854ccf936");
FalsePositiveProjectConfiguration config = new FalsePositiveProjectConfiguration();
List<FalsePositiveEntry> fpList = config.getFalsePositives();
FalsePositiveEntry entry = new FalsePositiveEntry();
entry.setAuthor("developer1");
entry.setCreated(new Date(1591962795187L));
FalsePositiveJobData jobData1 = new FalsePositiveJobData();
jobData1.setComment("Only used in documentation build not in deployment");
jobData1.setJobUUID(jobUUID);
jobData1.setFindingId(findingId);
entry.setJobData(jobData1);
FalsePositiveMetaData metaData = new FalsePositiveMetaData();
metaData.setCweId(Integer.valueOf(36));
FalsePositiveCodeMetaData code = new FalsePositiveCodeMetaData();
FalsePositiveCodePartMetaData start = new FalsePositiveCodePartMetaData();
start.setLocation("java/com/mercedesbenz/sechub/docgen/AsciidocGenerator.java");
start.setRelevantPart("args");
start.setSourceCode("\tpublic static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {");
code.setStart(start);
FalsePositiveCodePartMetaData end = new FalsePositiveCodePartMetaData();
end.setLocation("java/com/mercedesbenz/sechub/docgen/AsciidocGenerator.java");
end.setRelevantPart("File");
end.setSourceCode("\t\tFile documentsGenFolder = new File(path);");
code.setEnd(end);
metaData.setCode(code);
metaData.setScanType(ScanType.CODE_SCAN);
metaData.setSeverity(Severity.MEDIUM);
metaData.setName("Absolute Path Traversal");
entry.setMetaData(metaData);
fpList.add(entry);
when(falsePositiveJobDataService.fetchFalsePositivesProjectConfiguration(PROJECT1_ID)).thenReturn(config);
/* execute + test @formatter:off */
String metaDataPath = PROPERTY_FALSE_POSITIVES + "[]." + FalsePositiveEntry.PROPERTY_METADATA;
String codeMetaDataPath = metaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveMetaData.PROPERTY_CODE;
this.mockMvc.perform(get(apiEndpoint, PROJECT1_ID)).andExpect(status().isOk()).andDo(defineRestService().with().useCaseData(useCase).tag(RestDocFactory.extractTag(apiEndpoint)).responseSchema(OpenApiSchema.FALSE_POSITVES.getSchema()).and().document(responseFields(fieldWithPath(PROPERTY_FALSE_POSITIVES).description("Job data list containing false positive setup based on former jobs"), fieldWithPath(PROPERTY_FALSE_POSITIVES + "[]." + FalsePositiveEntry.PROPERTY_AUTHOR).description("User id of author who created false positive"), fieldWithPath(PROPERTY_FALSE_POSITIVES + "[]." + FalsePositiveEntry.PROPERTY_CREATED).description("Creation timestamp"), fieldWithPath(metaDataPath).description("Meta data for this false positive"), fieldWithPath(metaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveMetaData.PROPERTY_SCANTYPE).description("Scan type - e.g. codeScan"), fieldWithPath(metaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveMetaData.PROPERTY_NAME).description("Name of origin finding marked as false positive"), fieldWithPath(metaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveMetaData.PROPERTY_CWE_ID).type(JsonFieldType.NUMBER).optional().description("CWE (common weakness enumeration). For code scans this is always set."), fieldWithPath(metaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveMetaData.PROPERTY_CVE_ID).type(JsonFieldType.STRING).optional().description("CVE (common vulnerability and exposures). For infra scans this is always set."), fieldWithPath(metaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveMetaData.PROPERTY_OWASP).type(JsonFieldType.STRING).optional().description("OWASP At least this field must be set for web scans when no cwe identifier is defined."), fieldWithPath(metaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveMetaData.PROPERTY_SEVERITY).description("Severity of origin report entry marked as false positive"), fieldWithPath(codeMetaDataPath).optional().description("Code part. Only available for scan type 'codeScan'"), fieldWithPath(codeMetaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveCodeMetaData.PROPERTY_START).description("entry point"), fieldWithPath(codeMetaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveCodeMetaData.PROPERTY_START + "." + FalsePositiveCodePartMetaData.PROPERTY_LOCATION).description("location of code"), fieldWithPath(codeMetaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveCodeMetaData.PROPERTY_START + "." + FalsePositiveCodePartMetaData.PROPERTY_RELEVANT_PART).description("relevant part of source vulnerability"), fieldWithPath(codeMetaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveCodeMetaData.PROPERTY_START + "." + FalsePositiveCodePartMetaData.PROPERTY_SOURCE_CODE).description("source code"), fieldWithPath(codeMetaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveCodeMetaData.PROPERTY_END).optional().description("end point (sink)"), fieldWithPath(codeMetaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveCodeMetaData.PROPERTY_END + "." + FalsePositiveCodePartMetaData.PROPERTY_LOCATION).description("location of code"), fieldWithPath(codeMetaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveCodeMetaData.PROPERTY_END + "." + FalsePositiveCodePartMetaData.PROPERTY_RELEVANT_PART).description("relevant part of source vulnerability"), fieldWithPath(codeMetaDataPath + "." + FalsePositiveCodeMetaData.PROPERTY_END + "." + FalsePositiveCodePartMetaData.PROPERTY_SOURCE_CODE).description("source code"), fieldWithPath(PROPERTY_FALSE_POSITIVES + "[]." + FalsePositiveEntry.PROPERTY_JOBDATA).description("Job data parts, can be used as key to identify false positives"), fieldWithPath(PROPERTY_FALSE_POSITIVES + "[]." + FalsePositiveEntry.PROPERTY_JOBDATA + "." + PROPERTY_JOBUUID).description("SecHub job uuid where finding was"), fieldWithPath(PROPERTY_FALSE_POSITIVES + "[]." + FalsePositiveEntry.PROPERTY_JOBDATA + "." + PROPERTY_FINDINGID).description("SecHub finding identifier - identifies problem inside the job which shall be markeda as a false positive. *ATTENTION*: at the moment only code scan false positive handling is supported. Infra and web scan findings will lead to a non accepted error!"), fieldWithPath(PROPERTY_FALSE_POSITIVES + "[]." + FalsePositiveEntry.PROPERTY_JOBDATA + "." + PROPERTY_COMMENT).optional().description("A comment from author describing why this was marked as a false positive")), pathParameters(parameterWithName(PROJECT_ID.paramName()).description("The project id"))));
/* @formatter:on */
}
Aggregations