use of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue in project flink by apache.
the class WindowOperatorTest method testSessionWindows.
@Test
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public void testSessionWindows() throws Exception {
closeCalled.set(0);
final int SESSION_SIZE = 3;
TypeInformation<Tuple2<String, Integer>> inputType = TypeInfoParser.parse("Tuple2<String, Integer>");
ListStateDescriptor<Tuple2<String, Integer>> stateDesc = new ListStateDescriptor<>("window-contents", inputType.createSerializer(new ExecutionConfig()));
WindowOperator<String, Tuple2<String, Integer>, Iterable<Tuple2<String, Integer>>, Tuple3<String, Long, Long>, TimeWindow> operator = new WindowOperator<>(EventTimeSessionWindows.withGap(Time.seconds(SESSION_SIZE)), new TimeWindow.Serializer(), new TupleKeySelector(), BasicTypeInfo.STRING_TYPE_INFO.createSerializer(new ExecutionConfig()), stateDesc, new InternalIterableWindowFunction<>(new SessionWindowFunction()), EventTimeTrigger.create(), 0, null);
OneInputStreamOperatorTestHarness<Tuple2<String, Integer>, Tuple3<String, Long, Long>> testHarness = new KeyedOneInputStreamOperatorTestHarness<>(operator, new TupleKeySelector(), BasicTypeInfo.STRING_TYPE_INFO);
ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Object> expectedOutput = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<>();
testHarness.open();
// add elements out-of-order
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 0));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 2), 1000));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 3), 2500));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key1", 1), 10));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key1", 2), 1000));
// do a snapshot, close and restore again
OperatorStateHandles snapshot = testHarness.snapshot(0L, 0L);
testHarness.close();
testHarness.setup();
testHarness.initializeState(snapshot);
testHarness.open();
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key1", 3), 2500));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 4), 5501));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 5), 6000));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 5), 6000));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 6), 6050));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(12000));
expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple3<>("key1-6", 10L, 5500L), 5499));
expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple3<>("key2-6", 0L, 5500L), 5499));
expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple3<>("key2-20", 5501L, 9050L), 9049));
expectedOutput.add(new Watermark(12000));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 10), 15000));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 20), 15000));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(17999));
expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple3<>("key2-30", 15000L, 18000L), 17999));
expectedOutput.add(new Watermark(17999));
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("Output was not correct.", expectedOutput, testHarness.getOutput(), new Tuple3ResultSortComparator());
testHarness.close();
}
use of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue in project flink by apache.
the class WindowOperatorTest method testNotSideOutputDueToLatenessSessionWithHugeLatenessPurgingTrigger.
@Test
public void testNotSideOutputDueToLatenessSessionWithHugeLatenessPurgingTrigger() throws Exception {
final int GAP_SIZE = 3;
final long LATENESS = 10000;
TypeInformation<Tuple2<String, Integer>> inputType = TypeInfoParser.parse("Tuple2<String, Integer>");
ReducingStateDescriptor<Tuple2<String, Integer>> stateDesc = new ReducingStateDescriptor<>("window-contents", new SumReducer(), inputType.createSerializer(new ExecutionConfig()));
WindowOperator<String, Tuple2<String, Integer>, Tuple2<String, Integer>, Tuple3<String, Long, Long>, TimeWindow> operator = new WindowOperator<>(EventTimeSessionWindows.withGap(Time.seconds(GAP_SIZE)), new TimeWindow.Serializer(), new TupleKeySelector(), BasicTypeInfo.STRING_TYPE_INFO.createSerializer(new ExecutionConfig()), stateDesc, new InternalSingleValueWindowFunction<>(new ReducedSessionWindowFunction()), PurgingTrigger.of(EventTimeTrigger.create()), LATENESS, null);
OneInputStreamOperatorTestHarness<Tuple2<String, Integer>, Tuple3<String, Long, Long>> testHarness = new KeyedOneInputStreamOperatorTestHarness<>(operator, new TupleKeySelector(), BasicTypeInfo.STRING_TYPE_INFO);
testHarness.open();
ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Object> expected = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<>();
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 1000));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(1999));
expected.add(new Watermark(1999));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 2000));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(4998));
expected.add(new Watermark(4998));
// this will not be sideoutput because the session we're adding two has maxTimestamp
// after the current watermark
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 4500));
// new session
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 8500));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(7400));
expected.add(new Watermark(7400));
// this will merge the two sessions into one
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 7000));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(11501));
expected.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple3<>("key2-5", 1000L, 11500L), 11499));
expected.add(new Watermark(11501));
// new session
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 11600));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(14600));
expected.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple3<>("key2-1", 11600L, 14600L), 14599));
expected.add(new Watermark(14600));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 10000));
expected.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple3<>("key2-1", 1000L, 14600L), 14599));
ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Object> actual = testHarness.getOutput();
ConcurrentLinkedQueue<StreamRecord<Tuple2<String, Integer>>> sideActual = testHarness.getSideOutput(lateOutputTag);
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("Output was not correct.", expected, actual, new Tuple3ResultSortComparator());
assertEquals(null, sideActual);
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 14500));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(20000));
expected.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple3<>("key2-1", 1000L, 17500L), 17499));
expected.add(new Watermark(20000));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(100000));
expected.add(new Watermark(100000));
actual = testHarness.getOutput();
sideActual = testHarness.getSideOutput(lateOutputTag);
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("Output was not correct.", expected, actual, new Tuple3ResultSortComparator());
assertEquals(null, sideActual);
testHarness.close();
}
use of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue in project flink by apache.
the class WindowOperatorTest method testSideOutputDueToLatenessSessionZeroLatenessPurgingTrigger.
@Test
public void testSideOutputDueToLatenessSessionZeroLatenessPurgingTrigger() throws Exception {
final int GAP_SIZE = 3;
final long LATENESS = 0;
TypeInformation<Tuple2<String, Integer>> inputType = TypeInfoParser.parse("Tuple2<String, Integer>");
ReducingStateDescriptor<Tuple2<String, Integer>> stateDesc = new ReducingStateDescriptor<>("window-contents", new SumReducer(), inputType.createSerializer(new ExecutionConfig()));
WindowOperator<String, Tuple2<String, Integer>, Tuple2<String, Integer>, Tuple3<String, Long, Long>, TimeWindow> operator = new WindowOperator<>(EventTimeSessionWindows.withGap(Time.seconds(GAP_SIZE)), new TimeWindow.Serializer(), new TupleKeySelector(), BasicTypeInfo.STRING_TYPE_INFO.createSerializer(new ExecutionConfig()), stateDesc, new InternalSingleValueWindowFunction<>(new ReducedSessionWindowFunction()), PurgingTrigger.of(EventTimeTrigger.create()), LATENESS, lateOutputTag);
OneInputStreamOperatorTestHarness<Tuple2<String, Integer>, Tuple3<String, Long, Long>> testHarness = new KeyedOneInputStreamOperatorTestHarness<>(operator, new TupleKeySelector(), BasicTypeInfo.STRING_TYPE_INFO);
testHarness.open();
ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Object> expected = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<>();
ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Object> sideExpected = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<>();
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 1000));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(1999));
expected.add(new Watermark(1999));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 2000));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(4998));
expected.add(new Watermark(4998));
// this will not be dropped because the session we're adding two has maxTimestamp
// after the current watermark
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 4500));
// new session
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 8500));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(7400));
expected.add(new Watermark(7400));
// this will merge the two sessions into one
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 7000));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(11501));
expected.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple3<>("key2-5", 1000L, 11500L), 11499));
expected.add(new Watermark(11501));
// new session
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 11600));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(14600));
expected.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple3<>("key2-1", 11600L, 14600L), 14599));
expected.add(new Watermark(14600));
// this is side output as late
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 10000));
sideExpected.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 10000));
// this is also side output as late (we test that they are not accidentally merged)
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 10100));
sideExpected.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 10100));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 14500));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(20000));
expected.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple3<>("key2-1", 14500L, 17500L), 17499));
expected.add(new Watermark(20000));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(100000));
expected.add(new Watermark(100000));
ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Object> actual = testHarness.getOutput();
ConcurrentLinkedQueue<StreamRecord<Tuple2<String, Integer>>> sideActual = testHarness.getSideOutput(lateOutputTag);
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("Output was not correct.", expected, actual, new Tuple2ResultSortComparator());
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("SideOutput was not correct.", sideExpected, (Iterable) sideActual, new Tuple2ResultSortComparator());
testHarness.close();
}
use of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue in project flink by apache.
the class WindowOperatorTest method testLateness.
@Test
public void testLateness() throws Exception {
final int WINDOW_SIZE = 2;
final long LATENESS = 500;
TypeInformation<Tuple2<String, Integer>> inputType = TypeInfoParser.parse("Tuple2<String, Integer>");
ReducingStateDescriptor<Tuple2<String, Integer>> stateDesc = new ReducingStateDescriptor<>("window-contents", new SumReducer(), inputType.createSerializer(new ExecutionConfig()));
WindowOperator<String, Tuple2<String, Integer>, Tuple2<String, Integer>, Tuple2<String, Integer>, TimeWindow> operator = new WindowOperator<>(TumblingEventTimeWindows.of(Time.of(WINDOW_SIZE, TimeUnit.SECONDS)), new TimeWindow.Serializer(), new TupleKeySelector(), BasicTypeInfo.STRING_TYPE_INFO.createSerializer(new ExecutionConfig()), stateDesc, new InternalSingleValueWindowFunction<>(new PassThroughWindowFunction<String, TimeWindow, Tuple2<String, Integer>>()), PurgingTrigger.of(EventTimeTrigger.create()), LATENESS, lateOutputTag);
OneInputStreamOperatorTestHarness<Tuple2<String, Integer>, Tuple2<String, Integer>> testHarness = new KeyedOneInputStreamOperatorTestHarness<>(operator, new TupleKeySelector(), BasicTypeInfo.STRING_TYPE_INFO);
testHarness.open();
ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Object> expected = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<>();
ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Object> lateExpected = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<>();
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 500));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(1500));
expected.add(new Watermark(1500));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 1300));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(2300));
expected.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 2), 1999));
expected.add(new Watermark(2300));
// this will not be sideoutput because window.maxTimestamp() + allowedLateness > currentWatermark
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 1997));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(6000));
// this is 1 and not 3 because the trigger fires and purges
expected.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 1999));
expected.add(new Watermark(6000));
// this will be side output because window.maxTimestamp() + allowedLateness < currentWatermark
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 1998));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(7000));
lateExpected.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 1998));
expected.add(new Watermark(7000));
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("Output was not correct.", expected, testHarness.getOutput(), new Tuple2ResultSortComparator());
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("SideOutput was not correct.", lateExpected, (Iterable) testHarness.getSideOutput(lateOutputTag), new Tuple2ResultSortComparator());
testHarness.close();
}
use of java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue in project flink by apache.
the class WindowOperatorTest method testSlidingEventTimeWindows.
private void testSlidingEventTimeWindows(OneInputStreamOperatorTestHarness<Tuple2<String, Integer>, Tuple2<String, Integer>> testHarness) throws Exception {
ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Object> expectedOutput = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<>();
// add elements out-of-order
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 3999));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 3000));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key1", 1), 20));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key1", 1), 0));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key1", 1), 999));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 1998));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 1999));
testHarness.processElement(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 1), 1000));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(999));
expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key1", 3), 999));
expectedOutput.add(new Watermark(999));
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("Output was not correct.", expectedOutput, testHarness.getOutput(), new Tuple2ResultSortComparator());
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(1999));
expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key1", 3), 1999));
expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 3), 1999));
expectedOutput.add(new Watermark(1999));
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("Output was not correct.", expectedOutput, testHarness.getOutput(), new Tuple2ResultSortComparator());
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(2999));
expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key1", 3), 2999));
expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 3), 2999));
expectedOutput.add(new Watermark(2999));
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("Output was not correct.", expectedOutput, testHarness.getOutput(), new Tuple2ResultSortComparator());
// do a snapshot, close and restore again
OperatorStateHandles snapshot = testHarness.snapshot(0L, 0L);
testHarness.close();
testHarness.setup();
testHarness.initializeState(snapshot);
testHarness.open();
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(3999));
expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 5), 3999));
expectedOutput.add(new Watermark(3999));
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("Output was not correct.", expectedOutput, testHarness.getOutput(), new Tuple2ResultSortComparator());
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(4999));
expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 2), 4999));
expectedOutput.add(new Watermark(4999));
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("Output was not correct.", expectedOutput, testHarness.getOutput(), new Tuple2ResultSortComparator());
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(5999));
expectedOutput.add(new StreamRecord<>(new Tuple2<>("key2", 2), 5999));
expectedOutput.add(new Watermark(5999));
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("Output was not correct.", expectedOutput, testHarness.getOutput(), new Tuple2ResultSortComparator());
// those don't have any effect...
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(6999));
testHarness.processWatermark(new Watermark(7999));
expectedOutput.add(new Watermark(6999));
expectedOutput.add(new Watermark(7999));
TestHarnessUtil.assertOutputEqualsSorted("Output was not correct.", expectedOutput, testHarness.getOutput(), new Tuple2ResultSortComparator());
}
Aggregations