use of org.apache.camel.WaitForTaskToComplete in project camel by apache.
the class RouteboxSedaProducer method process.
public boolean process(final Exchange exchange, final AsyncCallback callback) {
// use a new copy of the exchange to route async and handover the on completion to the new copy
// so its the new copy that performs the on completion callback when its done
Exchange copy = ExchangeHelper.createCorrelatedCopy(exchange, true);
// set a new from endpoint to be the seda queue
copy.setFromEndpoint(endpoint);
WaitForTaskToComplete wait = waitForTaskToComplete;
if (exchange.getProperty(Exchange.ASYNC_WAIT) != null) {
wait = exchange.getProperty(Exchange.ASYNC_WAIT, WaitForTaskToComplete.class);
}
if (wait == WaitForTaskToComplete.Always || (wait == WaitForTaskToComplete.IfReplyExpected && ExchangeHelper.isOutCapable(exchange))) {
// latch that waits until we are complete
final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
// we should wait for the reply so install a on completion so we know when its complete
copy.addOnCompletion(new SynchronizationAdapter() {
@Override
public void onDone(Exchange response) {
// check for timeout, which then already would have invoked the latch
if (latch.getCount() == 0) {
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) {
log.trace("{}. Timeout occurred so response will be ignored: {}", this, response.hasOut() ? response.getOut() : response.getIn());
}
return;
} else {
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) {
log.trace("{} with response: {}", this, response.hasOut() ? response.getOut() : response.getIn());
}
try {
ExchangeHelper.copyResults(exchange, response);
} finally {
// always ensure latch is triggered
latch.countDown();
}
}
}
@Override
public boolean allowHandover() {
return false;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return "onDone at [" + endpoint.getEndpointUri() + "]";
}
});
queue.add(copy);
if (timeout > 0) {
log.trace("Waiting for task to complete using timeout (ms): {} at [{}]", timeout, endpoint.getEndpointUri());
// lets see if we can get the task done before the timeout
boolean done = false;
try {
done = latch.await(timeout, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// ignore
}
if (!done) {
exchange.setException(new ExchangeTimedOutException(exchange, timeout));
// count down to indicate timeout
latch.countDown();
}
} else {
log.trace("Waiting for task to complete (blocking) at [{}]", endpoint.getEndpointUri());
// no timeout then wait until its done
try {
latch.await();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// ignore
}
}
} else {
// no wait, eg its a InOnly then just add to queue and return
queue.add(copy);
}
// we use OnCompletion on the Exchange to callback and wait for the Exchange to be done
// so we should just signal the callback we are done synchronously
callback.done(true);
return true;
}
use of org.apache.camel.WaitForTaskToComplete in project camel by apache.
the class DisruptorProducer method process.
@Override
public boolean process(final Exchange exchange, final AsyncCallback callback) {
WaitForTaskToComplete wait = waitForTaskToComplete;
if (exchange.getProperty(Exchange.ASYNC_WAIT) != null) {
wait = exchange.getProperty(Exchange.ASYNC_WAIT, WaitForTaskToComplete.class);
}
if (wait == WaitForTaskToComplete.Always || (wait == WaitForTaskToComplete.IfReplyExpected && ExchangeHelper.isOutCapable(exchange))) {
// do not handover the completion as we wait for the copy to complete, and copy its result back when it done
final Exchange copy = prepareCopy(exchange, false);
// latch that waits until we are complete
final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
// we should wait for the reply so install a on completion so we know when its complete
copy.addOnCompletion(new SynchronizationAdapter() {
@Override
public void onDone(final Exchange response) {
// check for timeout, which then already would have invoked the latch
if (latch.getCount() == 0) {
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) {
log.trace("{}. Timeout occurred so response will be ignored: {}", this, response.hasOut() ? response.getOut() : response.getIn());
}
} else {
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) {
log.trace("{} with response: {}", this, response.hasOut() ? response.getOut() : response.getIn());
}
try {
ExchangeHelper.copyResults(exchange, response);
} finally {
// always ensure latch is triggered
latch.countDown();
}
}
}
@Override
public boolean allowHandover() {
// at this point in the routing (at this leg), instead of at the very last (this ensure timeout is honored)
return false;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return "onDone at endpoint: " + endpoint;
}
});
doPublish(copy);
if (timeout > 0) {
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) {
log.trace("Waiting for task to complete using timeout (ms): {} at [{}]", timeout, endpoint.getEndpointUri());
}
// lets see if we can get the task done before the timeout
boolean done = false;
try {
done = latch.await(timeout, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// ignore
}
if (!done) {
// Remove timed out Exchange from disruptor endpoint.
// We can't actually remove a published exchange from an active Disruptor.
// Instead we prevent processing of the exchange by setting a Property on the exchange and the value
// would be an AtomicBoolean. This is set by the Producer and the Consumer would look up that Property and
// check the AtomicBoolean. If the AtomicBoolean says that we are good to proceed, it will process the
// exchange. If false, it will simply disregard the exchange.
// But since the Property map is a Concurrent one, maybe we don't need the AtomicBoolean. Check with Simon.
// Also check the TimeoutHandler of the new Disruptor 3.0.0, consider making the switch to the latest version.
exchange.setProperty(DisruptorEndpoint.DISRUPTOR_IGNORE_EXCHANGE, true);
exchange.setException(new ExchangeTimedOutException(exchange, timeout));
// count down to indicate timeout
latch.countDown();
}
} else {
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) {
log.trace("Waiting for task to complete (blocking) at [{}]", endpoint.getEndpointUri());
}
// no timeout then wait until its done
try {
latch.await();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// ignore
}
}
} else {
// no wait, eg its a InOnly then just publish to the ringbuffer and return
// handover the completion so its the copy which performs that, as we do not wait
final Exchange copy = prepareCopy(exchange, true);
doPublish(copy);
}
// we use OnCompletion on the Exchange to callback and wait for the Exchange to be done
// so we should just signal the callback we are done synchronously
callback.done(true);
return true;
}
use of org.apache.camel.WaitForTaskToComplete in project camel by apache.
the class SedaProducer method process.
@Override
public boolean process(final Exchange exchange, final AsyncCallback callback) {
WaitForTaskToComplete wait = waitForTaskToComplete;
if (exchange.getProperty(Exchange.ASYNC_WAIT) != null) {
wait = exchange.getProperty(Exchange.ASYNC_WAIT, WaitForTaskToComplete.class);
}
if (wait == WaitForTaskToComplete.Always || (wait == WaitForTaskToComplete.IfReplyExpected && ExchangeHelper.isOutCapable(exchange))) {
// do not handover the completion as we wait for the copy to complete, and copy its result back when it done
Exchange copy = prepareCopy(exchange, false);
// latch that waits until we are complete
final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
// we should wait for the reply so install a on completion so we know when its complete
copy.addOnCompletion(new SynchronizationAdapter() {
@Override
public void onDone(Exchange response) {
// check for timeout, which then already would have invoked the latch
if (latch.getCount() == 0) {
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) {
log.trace("{}. Timeout occurred so response will be ignored: {}", this, response.hasOut() ? response.getOut() : response.getIn());
}
return;
} else {
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) {
log.trace("{} with response: {}", this, response.hasOut() ? response.getOut() : response.getIn());
}
try {
ExchangeHelper.copyResults(exchange, response);
} finally {
// always ensure latch is triggered
latch.countDown();
}
}
}
@Override
public boolean allowHandover() {
// at this point in the routing (at this leg), instead of at the very last (this ensure timeout is honored)
return false;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return "onDone at endpoint: " + endpoint;
}
});
log.trace("Adding Exchange to queue: {}", copy);
try {
// do not copy as we already did the copy
addToQueue(copy, false);
} catch (SedaConsumerNotAvailableException e) {
exchange.setException(e);
callback.done(true);
return true;
}
if (timeout > 0) {
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) {
log.trace("Waiting for task to complete using timeout (ms): {} at [{}]", timeout, endpoint.getEndpointUri());
}
// lets see if we can get the task done before the timeout
boolean done = false;
try {
done = latch.await(timeout, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// ignore
}
if (!done) {
exchange.setException(new ExchangeTimedOutException(exchange, timeout));
// remove timed out Exchange from queue
endpoint.getQueue().remove(copy);
// count down to indicate timeout
latch.countDown();
}
} else {
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) {
log.trace("Waiting for task to complete (blocking) at [{}]", endpoint.getEndpointUri());
}
// no timeout then wait until its done
try {
latch.await();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// ignore
}
}
} else {
// no wait, eg its a InOnly then just add to queue and return
try {
addToQueue(exchange, true);
} catch (SedaConsumerNotAvailableException e) {
exchange.setException(e);
callback.done(true);
return true;
}
}
// we use OnCompletion on the Exchange to callback and wait for the Exchange to be done
// so we should just signal the callback we are done synchronously
callback.done(true);
return true;
}
Aggregations