use of org.apache.pulsar.common.policies.data.PropertyAdmin in project incubator-pulsar by apache.
the class TopicsConsumerImplTest method testSubscribeUnsubscribeSingleTopic.
@Test
public void testSubscribeUnsubscribeSingleTopic() throws Exception {
String key = "TopicsConsumerSubscribeUnsubscribeSingleTopicTest";
final String subscriptionName = "my-ex-subscription-" + key;
final String messagePredicate = "my-message-" + key + "-";
final int totalMessages = 30;
final String topicName1 = "persistent://prop/use/ns-abc/topic-1-" + key;
final String topicName2 = "persistent://prop/use/ns-abc/topic-2-" + key;
final String topicName3 = "persistent://prop/use/ns-abc/topic-3-" + key;
List<String> topicNames = Lists.newArrayList(topicName1, topicName2, topicName3);
admin.properties().createProperty("prop", new PropertyAdmin());
admin.persistentTopics().createPartitionedTopic(topicName2, 2);
admin.persistentTopics().createPartitionedTopic(topicName3, 3);
// 1. producer connect
Producer<byte[]> producer1 = pulsarClient.newProducer().topic(topicName1).create();
Producer<byte[]> producer2 = pulsarClient.newProducer().topic(topicName2).messageRoutingMode(org.apache.pulsar.client.api.MessageRoutingMode.RoundRobinPartition).create();
Producer<byte[]> producer3 = pulsarClient.newProducer().topic(topicName3).messageRoutingMode(org.apache.pulsar.client.api.MessageRoutingMode.RoundRobinPartition).create();
// 2. Create consumer
Consumer<byte[]> consumer = pulsarClient.newConsumer().topics(topicNames).subscriptionName(subscriptionName).subscriptionType(SubscriptionType.Shared).ackTimeout(ackTimeOutMillis, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS).receiverQueueSize(4).subscribe();
assertTrue(consumer instanceof TopicsConsumerImpl);
// 3. producer publish messages
for (int i = 0; i < totalMessages / 3; i++) {
producer1.send((messagePredicate + "producer1-" + i).getBytes());
producer2.send((messagePredicate + "producer2-" + i).getBytes());
producer3.send((messagePredicate + "producer3-" + i).getBytes());
}
int messageSet = 0;
Message<byte[]> message = consumer.receive();
do {
assertTrue(message instanceof TopicMessageImpl);
messageSet++;
consumer.acknowledge(message);
log.debug("Consumer acknowledged : " + new String(message.getData()));
message = consumer.receive(500, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
} while (message != null);
assertEquals(messageSet, totalMessages);
// 4, unsubscribe topic3
CompletableFuture<Void> unsubFuture = ((TopicsConsumerImpl<byte[]>) consumer).unsubscribeAsync(topicName3);
unsubFuture.get();
// 5. producer publish messages
for (int i = 0; i < totalMessages / 3; i++) {
producer1.send((messagePredicate + "producer1-round2" + i).getBytes());
producer2.send((messagePredicate + "producer2-round2" + i).getBytes());
producer3.send((messagePredicate + "producer3-round2" + i).getBytes());
}
// 6. should not receive messages from topic3, verify get 2/3 of all messages
messageSet = 0;
message = consumer.receive();
do {
assertTrue(message instanceof TopicMessageImpl);
messageSet++;
consumer.acknowledge(message);
log.debug("Consumer acknowledged : " + new String(message.getData()));
message = consumer.receive(500, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
} while (message != null);
assertEquals(messageSet, totalMessages * 2 / 3);
// 7. use getter to verify internal topics number after un-subscribe topic3
List<String> topics = ((TopicsConsumerImpl<byte[]>) consumer).getPartitionedTopics();
List<ConsumerImpl<byte[]>> consumers = ((TopicsConsumerImpl) consumer).getConsumers();
assertEquals(topics.size(), 3);
assertEquals(consumers.size(), 3);
assertTrue(((TopicsConsumerImpl<byte[]>) consumer).getTopics().size() == 2);
// 8. re-subscribe topic3
CompletableFuture<Void> subFuture = ((TopicsConsumerImpl<byte[]>) consumer).subscribeAsync(topicName3);
subFuture.get();
// 9. producer publish messages
for (int i = 0; i < totalMessages / 3; i++) {
producer1.send((messagePredicate + "producer1-round3" + i).getBytes());
producer2.send((messagePredicate + "producer2-round3" + i).getBytes());
producer3.send((messagePredicate + "producer3-round3" + i).getBytes());
}
// 10. should receive messages from all 3 topics
messageSet = 0;
message = consumer.receive();
do {
assertTrue(message instanceof TopicMessageImpl);
messageSet++;
consumer.acknowledge(message);
log.debug("Consumer acknowledged : " + new String(message.getData()));
message = consumer.receive(500, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
} while (message != null);
assertEquals(messageSet, totalMessages);
// 11. use getter to verify internal topics number after subscribe topic3
topics = ((TopicsConsumerImpl<byte[]>) consumer).getPartitionedTopics();
consumers = ((TopicsConsumerImpl) consumer).getConsumers();
assertEquals(topics.size(), 6);
assertEquals(consumers.size(), 6);
assertTrue(((TopicsConsumerImpl<byte[]>) consumer).getTopics().size() == 3);
consumer.unsubscribe();
consumer.close();
producer1.close();
producer2.close();
producer3.close();
}
use of org.apache.pulsar.common.policies.data.PropertyAdmin in project incubator-pulsar by apache.
the class AntiAffinityNamespaceGroupTest method testBrokerSelectionForAntiAffinityGroup.
/**
* It verifies anti-affinity with failure domain enabled with 2 brokers.
*
* <pre>
* 1. Register brokers to domain: domain-1: broker1 & domain-2: broker2
* 2. Load-Manager receives a watch and updates brokerToDomain cache with new domain data
* 3. Create two namespace with anti-affinity
* 4. Load-manager selects broker for each namespace such that from different domains
*
* </pre>
*
* @throws Exception
*/
@Test
public void testBrokerSelectionForAntiAffinityGroup() throws Exception {
final String broker1 = primaryHost;
final String broker2 = secondaryHost;
final String cluster = pulsar1.getConfiguration().getClusterName();
final String property = "prop";
final String namespace1 = property + "/" + cluster + "/ns1";
final String namespace2 = property + "/" + cluster + "/ns2";
final String namespaceAntiAffinityGroup = "group";
FailureDomain domain = new FailureDomain();
domain.brokers = Sets.newHashSet(broker1);
admin1.clusters().createFailureDomain(cluster, "domain1", domain);
domain.brokers = Sets.newHashSet(broker2);
admin1.clusters().createFailureDomain(cluster, "domain1", domain);
admin1.properties().createProperty(property, new PropertyAdmin(null, Sets.newHashSet(cluster)));
admin1.namespaces().createNamespace(namespace1);
admin1.namespaces().createNamespace(namespace2);
admin1.namespaces().setNamespaceAntiAffinityGroup(namespace1, namespaceAntiAffinityGroup);
admin1.namespaces().setNamespaceAntiAffinityGroup(namespace2, namespaceAntiAffinityGroup);
// validate strategically if brokerToDomainCache updated
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
if (!isLoadManagerUpdatedDomainCache(primaryLoadManager) || !isLoadManagerUpdatedDomainCache(secondaryLoadManager) || i != 4) {
Thread.sleep(200);
}
}
assertTrue(isLoadManagerUpdatedDomainCache(primaryLoadManager));
assertTrue(isLoadManagerUpdatedDomainCache(secondaryLoadManager));
ServiceUnitId serviceUnit = makeBundle(property, cluster, "ns1");
String selectedBroker1 = primaryLoadManager.selectBrokerForAssignment(serviceUnit).get();
serviceUnit = makeBundle(property, cluster, "ns2");
String selectedBroker2 = primaryLoadManager.selectBrokerForAssignment(serviceUnit).get();
assertNotEquals(selectedBroker1, selectedBroker2);
}
use of org.apache.pulsar.common.policies.data.PropertyAdmin in project incubator-pulsar by apache.
the class AntiAffinityNamespaceGroupTest method testAntiAffinityNamespaceFilteringWithDomain.
/**
* It verifies anti-affinity-namespace assignment with failure-domain
*
* <pre>
* Domain Brokers-count
* ________ ____________
* domain-0 broker-0,broker-1
* domain-1 broker-2,broker-3
*
* Anti-affinity-namespace assignment
*
* (1) ns0 -> candidate-brokers: b0, b1, b2, b3 => selected b0
* (2) ns1 -> candidate-brokers: b2, b3 => selected b2
* (3) ns2 -> candidate-brokers: b1, b3 => selected b1
* (4) ns3 -> candidate-brokers: b3 => selected b3
* (5) ns4 -> candidate-brokers: b0, b1, b2, b3 => selected b0
*
* "candidate" broker to own anti-affinity-namespace = b2 or b4
*
* </pre>
*/
@Test
public void testAntiAffinityNamespaceFilteringWithDomain() throws Exception {
final String namespace = "my-property/use/my-ns";
final int totalNamespaces = 5;
final String namespaceAntiAffinityGroup = "my-antiaffinity";
final String bundle = "/0x00000000_0xffffffff";
final int totalBrokers = 4;
pulsar1.getConfiguration().setFailureDomainsEnabled(true);
admin1.properties().createProperty("my-property", new PropertyAdmin(Lists.newArrayList("appid1", "appid2"), Sets.newHashSet("use")));
for (int i = 0; i < totalNamespaces; i++) {
final String ns = namespace + i;
admin1.namespaces().createNamespace(ns);
admin1.namespaces().setNamespaceAntiAffinityGroup(ns, namespaceAntiAffinityGroup);
}
Set<String> brokers = Sets.newHashSet();
Map<String, String> brokerToDomainMap = Maps.newHashMap();
brokers.add("brokerName-0");
brokerToDomainMap.put("brokerName-0", "domain-0");
brokers.add("brokerName-1");
brokerToDomainMap.put("brokerName-1", "domain-0");
brokers.add("brokerName-2");
brokerToDomainMap.put("brokerName-2", "domain-1");
brokers.add("brokerName-3");
brokerToDomainMap.put("brokerName-3", "domain-1");
Set<String> candidate = Sets.newHashSet();
Map<String, Map<String, Set<String>>> brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange = Maps.newHashMap();
assertEquals(brokers.size(), totalBrokers);
String assignedNamespace = namespace + "0" + bundle;
candidate.addAll(brokers);
// for namespace-0 all brokers available
LoadManagerShared.filterAntiAffinityGroupOwnedBrokers(pulsar1, assignedNamespace, brokers, brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, brokerToDomainMap);
assertEquals(brokers.size(), totalBrokers);
// add namespace-0 to broker-0 of domain-0 => state: n0->b0
selectBrokerForNamespace(brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, "brokerName-0", namespace + "0", assignedNamespace);
candidate.addAll(brokers);
// for namespace-1 only domain-1 brokers are available as broker-0 already owns namespace-0
assignedNamespace = namespace + "1" + bundle;
LoadManagerShared.filterAntiAffinityGroupOwnedBrokers(pulsar1, assignedNamespace, candidate, brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, brokerToDomainMap);
assertEquals(candidate.size(), 2);
candidate.forEach(broker -> assertEquals(brokerToDomainMap.get(broker), "domain-1"));
// add namespace-1 to broker-2 of domain-1 => state: n0->b0, n1->b2
selectBrokerForNamespace(brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, "brokerName-2", namespace + "1", assignedNamespace);
candidate.addAll(brokers);
// for namespace-2 only brokers available are : broker-1 and broker-3
assignedNamespace = namespace + "2" + bundle;
LoadManagerShared.filterAntiAffinityGroupOwnedBrokers(pulsar1, assignedNamespace, candidate, brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, brokerToDomainMap);
assertEquals(candidate.size(), 2);
assertTrue(candidate.contains("brokerName-1"));
assertTrue(candidate.contains("brokerName-3"));
// add namespace-2 to broker-1 of domain-0 => state: n0->b0, n1->b2, n2->b1
selectBrokerForNamespace(brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, "brokerName-1", namespace + "2", assignedNamespace);
candidate.addAll(brokers);
// for namespace-3 only brokers available are : broker-3
assignedNamespace = namespace + "3" + bundle;
LoadManagerShared.filterAntiAffinityGroupOwnedBrokers(pulsar1, assignedNamespace, candidate, brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, brokerToDomainMap);
assertEquals(candidate.size(), 1);
assertTrue(candidate.contains("brokerName-3"));
// add namespace-3 to broker-3 of domain-1 => state: n0->b0, n1->b2, n2->b1, n3->b3
selectBrokerForNamespace(brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, "brokerName-3", namespace + "3", assignedNamespace);
candidate.addAll(brokers);
// for namespace-4 only brokers available are : all 4 brokers
assignedNamespace = namespace + "4" + bundle;
LoadManagerShared.filterAntiAffinityGroupOwnedBrokers(pulsar1, assignedNamespace, candidate, brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, brokerToDomainMap);
assertEquals(candidate.size(), 4);
}
use of org.apache.pulsar.common.policies.data.PropertyAdmin in project incubator-pulsar by apache.
the class AntiAffinityNamespaceGroupTest method testAntiAffinityNamespaceFilteringWithoutDomain.
/**
* It verifies anti-affinity-namespace assignment without failure-domain enabled
*
* <pre>
* Anti-affinity-namespace assignment
*
* (1) ns0 -> candidate-brokers: b0, b1, b2 => selected b0
* (2) ns1 -> candidate-brokers: b1, b2 => selected b1
* (3) ns2 -> candidate-brokers: b2 => selected b2
* (5) ns3 -> candidate-brokers: b0, b1, b2 => selected b0
* </pre>
*
* @throws Exception
*/
@Test
public void testAntiAffinityNamespaceFilteringWithoutDomain() throws Exception {
final String namespace = "my-property/use/my-ns";
final int totalNamespaces = 5;
final String namespaceAntiAffinityGroup = "my-antiaffinity";
final String bundle = "/0x00000000_0xffffffff";
admin1.properties().createProperty("my-property", new PropertyAdmin(Lists.newArrayList("appid1", "appid2"), Sets.newHashSet("use")));
for (int i = 0; i < totalNamespaces; i++) {
final String ns = namespace + i;
admin1.namespaces().createNamespace(ns);
admin1.namespaces().setNamespaceAntiAffinityGroup(ns, namespaceAntiAffinityGroup);
}
Set<String> brokers = Sets.newHashSet();
Set<String> candidate = Sets.newHashSet();
Map<String, Map<String, Set<String>>> brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange = Maps.newHashMap();
brokers.add("broker-0");
brokers.add("broker-1");
brokers.add("broker-2");
String assignedNamespace = namespace + "0" + bundle;
// all brokers available so, candidate will be all 3 brokers
candidate.addAll(brokers);
LoadManagerShared.filterAntiAffinityGroupOwnedBrokers(pulsar1, assignedNamespace, brokers, brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, null);
assertEquals(brokers.size(), 3);
// add ns-0 to broker-0
selectBrokerForNamespace(brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, "broker-0", namespace + "0", assignedNamespace);
candidate.addAll(brokers);
assignedNamespace = namespace + "1" + bundle;
// available brokers for ns-1 => broker-1, broker-2
LoadManagerShared.filterAntiAffinityGroupOwnedBrokers(pulsar1, assignedNamespace, candidate, brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, null);
assertEquals(candidate.size(), 2);
assertTrue(candidate.contains("broker-1"));
assertTrue(candidate.contains("broker-2"));
// add ns-1 to broker-1
selectBrokerForNamespace(brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, "broker-1", namespace + "1", assignedNamespace);
candidate.addAll(brokers);
// available brokers for ns-2 => broker-2
assignedNamespace = namespace + "2" + bundle;
LoadManagerShared.filterAntiAffinityGroupOwnedBrokers(pulsar1, assignedNamespace, candidate, brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, null);
assertEquals(candidate.size(), 1);
assertTrue(candidate.contains("broker-2"));
// add ns-2 to broker-2
selectBrokerForNamespace(brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, "broker-2", namespace + "2", assignedNamespace);
candidate.addAll(brokers);
// available brokers for ns-3 => broker-0, broker-1, broker-2
assignedNamespace = namespace + "3" + bundle;
LoadManagerShared.filterAntiAffinityGroupOwnedBrokers(pulsar1, assignedNamespace, candidate, brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, null);
assertEquals(candidate.size(), 3);
}
use of org.apache.pulsar.common.policies.data.PropertyAdmin in project incubator-pulsar by apache.
the class AntiAffinityNamespaceGroupTest method testLoadSheddingUtilWithAntiAffinityNamespace.
/**
* It verifies that load-shedding task should unload namespace only if there is a broker available which doesn't
* cause uneven anti-affinitiy namespace distribution.
*
* <pre>
* 1. broker1 owns ns-0 => broker1 can unload ns-0
* 1. broker2 owns ns-1 => broker1 can unload ns-0
* 1. broker3 owns ns-2 => broker1 can't unload ns-0 as all brokers have same no NS
* </pre>
*
* @throws Exception
*/
@Test
public void testLoadSheddingUtilWithAntiAffinityNamespace() throws Exception {
final String namespace = "my-property/use/my-ns";
final int totalNamespaces = 5;
final String namespaceAntiAffinityGroup = "my-antiaffinity";
final String bundle = "/0x00000000_0xffffffff";
admin1.properties().createProperty("my-property", new PropertyAdmin(Lists.newArrayList("appid1", "appid2"), Sets.newHashSet("use")));
for (int i = 0; i < totalNamespaces; i++) {
final String ns = namespace + i;
admin1.namespaces().createNamespace(ns);
admin1.namespaces().setNamespaceAntiAffinityGroup(ns, namespaceAntiAffinityGroup);
}
Set<String> brokers = Sets.newHashSet();
Set<String> candidate = Sets.newHashSet();
Map<String, Map<String, Set<String>>> brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange = Maps.newHashMap();
brokers.add("broker-0");
brokers.add("broker-1");
brokers.add("broker-2");
String assignedNamespace = namespace + "0" + bundle;
// all brokers available so, candidate will be all 3 brokers
candidate.addAll(brokers);
// add ns-0 to broker-0
selectBrokerForNamespace(brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, "broker-0", namespace + "0", assignedNamespace);
String currentBroker = "broker-0";
boolean shouldUnload = LoadManagerShared.shouldAntiAffinityNamespaceUnload(namespace + "0", bundle, currentBroker, pulsar1, brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, candidate);
assertTrue(shouldUnload);
// add ns-1 to broker-1
selectBrokerForNamespace(brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, "broker-1", namespace + "1", assignedNamespace);
shouldUnload = LoadManagerShared.shouldAntiAffinityNamespaceUnload(namespace + "0", bundle, currentBroker, pulsar1, brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, candidate);
assertTrue(shouldUnload);
// add ns-2 to broker-2
selectBrokerForNamespace(brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, "broker-2", namespace + "2", assignedNamespace);
shouldUnload = LoadManagerShared.shouldAntiAffinityNamespaceUnload(namespace + "0", bundle, currentBroker, pulsar1, brokerToNamespaceToBundleRange, candidate);
assertFalse(shouldUnload);
}
Aggregations