use of com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.Dependency in project bazel by bazelbuild.
the class ConfiguredTargetFunction method mergeAspects.
/**
* Merges the each direct dependency configured target with the aspects associated with it.
*
* <p>Note that the combination of a configured target and its associated aspects are not
* represented by a Skyframe node. This is because there can possibly be many different
* combinations of aspects for a particular configured target, so it would result in a
* combinatiorial explosion of Skyframe nodes.
*/
private static OrderedSetMultimap<Attribute, ConfiguredTarget> mergeAspects(OrderedSetMultimap<Attribute, Dependency> depValueNames, Map<SkyKey, ConfiguredTarget> depConfiguredTargetMap, OrderedSetMultimap<SkyKey, ConfiguredAspect> depAspectMap) throws DuplicateException {
OrderedSetMultimap<Attribute, ConfiguredTarget> result = OrderedSetMultimap.create();
for (Map.Entry<Attribute, Dependency> entry : depValueNames.entries()) {
Dependency dep = entry.getValue();
SkyKey depKey = TO_KEYS.apply(dep);
ConfiguredTarget depConfiguredTarget = depConfiguredTargetMap.get(depKey);
result.put(entry.getKey(), MergedConfiguredTarget.of(depConfiguredTarget, depAspectMap.get(depKey)));
}
return result;
}
use of com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.Dependency in project bazel by bazelbuild.
the class ConfiguredTargetFunction method getDynamicConfigurations.
/**
* Creates a dynamic configuration for each dep that's custom-fitted specifically for that dep.
*
* <p>More specifically: given a set of {@link Dependency} instances holding dynamic config
* transition requests (e.g. {@link Dependency#hasStaticConfiguration()} == false}), returns
* equivalent dependencies containing dynamically created configurations applying those
* transitions. If {@link BuildConfiguration.Options#trimConfigurations()} is true, these
* configurations only contain the fragments needed by the dep and its transitive closure. Else
* the configurations unconditionally include all fragments.
*
* <p>This method is heavily performance-optimized. Because it, in aggregate, reads over every
* edge in the configured target graph, small inefficiencies can have observable impact on
* analysis time. Keep this in mind when making modifications and performance-test any changes you
* make.
*
* @param env Skyframe evaluation environment
* @param ctgValue the label and the configuration of the node
* @param originalDeps the set of configuration transition requests for this target's attributes
* @param hostConfiguration the host configuration
* @param ruleClassProvider the rule class provider for determining the right configuration
* fragments to apply to deps
*
* @return a mapping from each attribute to the {@link BuildConfiguration}s and {@link Label}s
* to use for that attribute's deps. Returns null if not all Skyframe dependencies are
* available yet.
*/
@Nullable
static OrderedSetMultimap<Attribute, Dependency> getDynamicConfigurations(Environment env, TargetAndConfiguration ctgValue, OrderedSetMultimap<Attribute, Dependency> originalDeps, BuildConfiguration hostConfiguration, RuleClassProvider ruleClassProvider) throws DependencyEvaluationException, InterruptedException {
// Maps each Skyframe-evaluated BuildConfiguration to the dependencies that need that
// configuration. For cases where Skyframe isn't needed to get the configuration (e.g. when
// we just re-used the original rule's configuration), we should skip this outright.
Multimap<SkyKey, Map.Entry<Attribute, Dependency>> keysToEntries = LinkedListMultimap.create();
// Stores the result of applying a dynamic transition to the current configuration using a
// particular subset of fragments. By caching this, we save from redundantly computing the
// same transition for every dependency edge that requests that transition. This can have
// real effect on analysis time for commonly triggered transitions.
//
// Split transitions may map to multiple values. All other transitions map to one.
Map<FragmentsAndTransition, List<BuildOptions>> transitionsMap = new LinkedHashMap<>();
// The fragments used by the current target's configuration.
Set<Class<? extends BuildConfiguration.Fragment>> ctgFragments = ctgValue.getConfiguration().fragmentClasses();
BuildOptions ctgOptions = ctgValue.getConfiguration().getOptions();
// Stores the dynamically configured versions of each dependency. This method must preserve the
// original label ordering of each attribute. For example, if originalDeps.get("data") is
// [":a", ":b"], the dynamic variant must also be [":a", ":b"] in the same order. Because we may
// not actualize the results in order (some results need Skyframe-evaluated configurations while
// others can be computed trivially), we dump them all into this map, then as a final step
// iterate through the original list and pluck out values from here for the final value.
//
// For split transitions, originaldeps.get("data") = [":a", ":b"] can produce the output
// [":a"<config1>, ":a"<config2>, ..., ":b"<config1>, ":b"<config2>, ...]. All instances of ":a"
// still appear before all instances of ":b". But the [":a"<config1>, ":a"<config2>"] subset may
// be in any (deterministic) order. In particular, this may not be the same order as
// SplitTransition.split. If needed, this code can be modified to use that order, but that
// involves more runtime in performance-critical code, so we won't make that change without a
// clear need.
//
// This map is used heavily by all builds. Inserts and gets should be as fast as possible.
Multimap<AttributeAndLabel, Dependency> dynamicDeps = LinkedHashMultimap.create();
// Performance optimization: This method iterates over originalDeps twice. By storing
// AttributeAndLabel instances in this list, we avoid having to recreate them the second time
// (particularly avoid recomputing their hash codes). Profiling shows this shaves 25% off this
// method's execution time (at the time of this comment).
ArrayList<AttributeAndLabel> attributesAndLabels = new ArrayList<>(originalDeps.size());
for (Map.Entry<Attribute, Dependency> depsEntry : originalDeps.entries()) {
Dependency dep = depsEntry.getValue();
AttributeAndLabel attributeAndLabel = new AttributeAndLabel(depsEntry.getKey(), dep.getLabel());
attributesAndLabels.add(attributeAndLabel);
// simple cc_binary show this saves ~1% of total analysis phase time.
if (dep.hasStaticConfiguration()) {
continue;
}
// Figure out the required fragments for this dep and its transitive closure.
Set<Class<? extends BuildConfiguration.Fragment>> depFragments = getTransitiveFragments(env, dep.getLabel(), ctgValue.getConfiguration());
if (depFragments == null) {
return null;
}
// to 0.5% of total analysis time as profiled over a simple cc_binary).
if (ctgValue.getConfiguration().trimConfigurations()) {
checkForMissingFragments(env, ctgValue, attributeAndLabel.attribute.getName(), dep, depFragments);
}
boolean sameFragments = depFragments.equals(ctgFragments);
Attribute.Transition transition = dep.getTransition();
if (sameFragments) {
if (transition == Attribute.ConfigurationTransition.NONE) {
// The dep uses the same exact configuration.
putOnlyEntry(dynamicDeps, attributeAndLabel, Dependency.withConfigurationAndAspects(dep.getLabel(), ctgValue.getConfiguration(), dep.getAspects()));
continue;
} else if (transition == HostTransition.INSTANCE) {
// The current rule's host configuration can also be used for the dep. We short-circuit
// the standard transition logic for host transitions because these transitions are
// uniquely frequent. It's possible, e.g., for every node in the configured target graph
// to incur multiple host transitions. So we aggressively optimize to avoid hurting
// analysis time.
putOnlyEntry(dynamicDeps, attributeAndLabel, Dependency.withConfigurationAndAspects(dep.getLabel(), hostConfiguration, dep.getAspects()));
continue;
}
}
// Apply the transition or use the cached result if it was already applied.
FragmentsAndTransition transitionKey = new FragmentsAndTransition(depFragments, transition);
List<BuildOptions> toOptions = transitionsMap.get(transitionKey);
if (toOptions == null) {
toOptions = getDynamicTransitionOptions(ctgOptions, transition, depFragments, ruleClassProvider, !sameFragments);
transitionsMap.put(transitionKey, toOptions);
}
// configuration.
if (sameFragments && toOptions.size() == 1 && Iterables.getOnlyElement(toOptions).equals(ctgOptions)) {
putOnlyEntry(dynamicDeps, attributeAndLabel, Dependency.withConfigurationAndAspects(dep.getLabel(), ctgValue.getConfiguration(), dep.getAspects()));
continue;
}
// If we get here, we have to get the configuration from Skyframe.
for (BuildOptions options : toOptions) {
keysToEntries.put(BuildConfigurationValue.key(depFragments, options), depsEntry);
}
}
// Get all BuildConfigurations we need from Skyframe. While not every value might be available,
// we don't call env.valuesMissing() here because that could be true from the earlier
// resolver.dependentNodeMap call in computeDependencies, which also calls Skyframe. This method
// doesn't need those missing values, but it still has to be called after
// resolver.dependentNodeMap because it consumes that method's output. The reason the missing
// values don't matter is because resolver.dependentNodeMap still returns "partial" results
// and this method runs over whatever's available.
//
// While there would be no *correctness* harm in nulling out early, there's significant
// *performance* harm. Profiling shows that putting "if (env.valuesMissing()) { return null; }"
// here (or even after resolver.dependentNodeMap) produces a ~30% performance hit on the
// analysis phase. That's because resolveConfiguredTargetDependencies and
// resolveAspectDependencies don't get a chance to make their own Skyframe requests before
// bailing out of this ConfiguredTargetFunction call. Ideally we could batch all requests
// from all methods into a single Skyframe call, but there are enough subtle data flow
// dependencies in ConfiguredTargetFucntion to make that impractical.
Map<SkyKey, ValueOrException<InvalidConfigurationException>> depConfigValues = env.getValuesOrThrow(keysToEntries.keySet(), InvalidConfigurationException.class);
// Now fill in the remaining unresolved deps with the now-resolved configurations.
try {
for (Map.Entry<SkyKey, ValueOrException<InvalidConfigurationException>> entry : depConfigValues.entrySet()) {
SkyKey key = entry.getKey();
ValueOrException<InvalidConfigurationException> valueOrException = entry.getValue();
if (valueOrException.get() == null) {
// null out on missing values from *this specific Skyframe request*.
return null;
}
BuildConfigurationValue trimmedConfig = (BuildConfigurationValue) valueOrException.get();
for (Map.Entry<Attribute, Dependency> info : keysToEntries.get(key)) {
Dependency originalDep = info.getValue();
AttributeAndLabel attr = new AttributeAndLabel(info.getKey(), originalDep.getLabel());
Dependency resolvedDep = Dependency.withConfigurationAndAspects(originalDep.getLabel(), trimmedConfig.getConfiguration(), originalDep.getAspects());
if (attr.attribute.hasSplitConfigurationTransition()) {
dynamicDeps.put(attr, resolvedDep);
} else {
putOnlyEntry(dynamicDeps, attr, resolvedDep);
}
}
}
} catch (InvalidConfigurationException e) {
throw new DependencyEvaluationException(e);
}
return sortDynamicallyConfiguredDeps(originalDeps, dynamicDeps, attributesAndLabels);
}
use of com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.Dependency in project bazel by bazelbuild.
the class ConfiguredTargetFunction method getConfigConditions.
/**
* Returns the set of {@link ConfigMatchingProvider}s that key the configurable attributes used by
* this rule.
*
* <p>>If the configured targets supplying those providers aren't yet resolved by the dependency
* resolver, returns null.
*/
@Nullable
static ImmutableMap<Label, ConfigMatchingProvider> getConfigConditions(Target target, Environment env, SkyframeDependencyResolver resolver, TargetAndConfiguration ctgValue, NestedSetBuilder<Package> transitivePackages, NestedSetBuilder<Label> transitiveLoadingRootCauses) throws DependencyEvaluationException, InterruptedException {
if (!(target instanceof Rule)) {
return NO_CONFIG_CONDITIONS;
}
Map<Label, ConfigMatchingProvider> configConditions = new LinkedHashMap<>();
// Collect the labels of the configured targets we need to resolve.
OrderedSetMultimap<Attribute, Label> configLabelMap = OrderedSetMultimap.create();
RawAttributeMapper attributeMap = RawAttributeMapper.of(((Rule) target));
for (Attribute a : ((Rule) target).getAttributes()) {
for (Label configLabel : attributeMap.getConfigurabilityKeys(a.getName(), a.getType())) {
if (!BuildType.Selector.isReservedLabel(configLabel)) {
configLabelMap.put(a, target.getLabel().resolveRepositoryRelative(configLabel));
}
}
}
if (configLabelMap.isEmpty()) {
return NO_CONFIG_CONDITIONS;
}
// Collect the corresponding Skyframe configured target values. Abort early if they haven't
// been computed yet.
Collection<Dependency> configValueNames = null;
try {
configValueNames = resolver.resolveRuleLabels(ctgValue, configLabelMap, transitiveLoadingRootCauses);
} catch (InconsistentAspectOrderException e) {
throw new DependencyEvaluationException(e);
}
if (env.valuesMissing()) {
return null;
}
// No need to get new configs from Skyframe - config_setting rules always use the current
// target's config.
// TODO(bazel-team): remove the need for this special transformation. We can probably do this by
// simply passing this through trimConfigurations.
BuildConfiguration targetConfig = ctgValue.getConfiguration();
if (useDynamicConfigurations(targetConfig)) {
ImmutableList.Builder<Dependency> staticConfigs = ImmutableList.builder();
for (Dependency dep : configValueNames) {
staticConfigs.add(Dependency.withConfigurationAndAspects(dep.getLabel(), targetConfig, dep.getAspects()));
}
configValueNames = staticConfigs.build();
}
Map<SkyKey, ConfiguredTarget> configValues = resolveConfiguredTargetDependencies(env, configValueNames, transitivePackages, transitiveLoadingRootCauses);
if (configValues == null) {
return null;
}
// Get the configured targets as ConfigMatchingProvider interfaces.
for (Dependency entry : configValueNames) {
ConfiguredTarget value = configValues.get(TO_KEYS.apply(entry));
// The code above guarantees that value is non-null here.
ConfigMatchingProvider provider = value.getProvider(ConfigMatchingProvider.class);
if (provider != null) {
configConditions.put(entry.getLabel(), provider);
} else {
// Not a valid provider for configuration conditions.
String message = entry.getLabel() + " is not a valid configuration key for " + target.getLabel();
env.getListener().handle(Event.error(TargetUtils.getLocationMaybe(target), message));
throw new DependencyEvaluationException(new ConfiguredValueCreationException(message, target.getLabel()));
}
}
return ImmutableMap.copyOf(configConditions);
}
Aggregations