use of org.neo4j.causalclustering.core.consensus.roles.follower.FollowerStates in project neo4j by neo4j.
the class LeaderTest method leaderShouldIgnoreSuccessResponseThatIndicatesLaggingWhileLocalStateIndicatesFollowerIsCaughtUp.
@Test
public void leaderShouldIgnoreSuccessResponseThatIndicatesLaggingWhileLocalStateIndicatesFollowerIsCaughtUp() throws Exception {
// given
/*
* A leader who
* - has an append index of 100
* - knows about instance 2
* - assumes that instance 2 is fully caught up
*/
Leader leader = new Leader();
MemberId instance2 = member(2);
int j = 100;
FollowerState instance2State = createArtificialFollowerState(j);
ReadableRaftState state = mock(ReadableRaftState.class);
FollowerStates<MemberId> followerState = new FollowerStates<>();
followerState = new FollowerStates<>(followerState, instance2, instance2State);
ReadableRaftLog logMock = mock(ReadableRaftLog.class);
when(logMock.appendIndex()).thenReturn(100L);
// with commit requests in this test
when(state.commitIndex()).thenReturn(-1L);
when(state.entryLog()).thenReturn(logMock);
when(state.followerStates()).thenReturn(followerState);
// both leader and follower are in the same term
when(state.term()).thenReturn(4L);
// when that leader is asked to handle a response from that follower that says that the follower is still
// missing things
RaftMessages.AppendEntries.Response response = appendEntriesResponse().success().matchIndex(80).term(4).from(instance2).build();
Outcome outcome = leader.handle(response, state, mock(Log.class));
// then the leader should not send anything, since this is a delayed, out of order response to a previous append
// request
assertTrue(outcome.getOutgoingMessages().isEmpty());
// The follower state should not be touched
FollowerStates<MemberId> updatedFollowerStates = outcome.getFollowerStates();
assertEquals(100, updatedFollowerStates.get(instance2).getMatchIndex());
}
Aggregations