use of org.neo4j.causalclustering.core.consensus.roles.follower.FollowerStates in project neo4j by neo4j.
the class LeaderTest method leaderShouldNotRespondToSuccessResponseThatIndicatesUpToDateFollower.
@Test
public void leaderShouldNotRespondToSuccessResponseThatIndicatesUpToDateFollower() throws Exception {
// given
/*
* A leader who
* - has an append index of 100
* - knows about instance 2
* - assumes that instance 2 is at an index less than 100 -say 84
*/
Leader leader = new Leader();
MemberId instance2 = member(2);
FollowerState instance2State = createArtificialFollowerState(84);
ReadableRaftState state = mock(ReadableRaftState.class);
FollowerStates<MemberId> followerState = new FollowerStates<>();
followerState = new FollowerStates<>(followerState, instance2, instance2State);
ReadableRaftLog logMock = mock(ReadableRaftLog.class);
when(logMock.appendIndex()).thenReturn(100L);
when(state.commitIndex()).thenReturn(-1L);
when(state.entryLog()).thenReturn(logMock);
when(state.followerStates()).thenReturn(followerState);
// both leader and follower are in the same term
when(state.term()).thenReturn(4L);
// when
// that leader is asked to handle a response from that follower that says that the follower is up to date
RaftMessages.AppendEntries.Response response = appendEntriesResponse().success().matchIndex(100).term(4).from(instance2).build();
Outcome outcome = leader.handle(response, state, mock(Log.class));
// then
// The leader should not be trying to send any messages to that instance
assertTrue(outcome.getOutgoingMessages().isEmpty());
// And the follower state should be updated
FollowerStates<MemberId> updatedFollowerStates = outcome.getFollowerStates();
assertEquals(100, updatedFollowerStates.get(instance2).getMatchIndex());
}
use of org.neo4j.causalclustering.core.consensus.roles.follower.FollowerStates in project neo4j by neo4j.
the class LeaderTest method leaderShouldRespondToSuccessResponseThatIndicatesLaggingFollowerWithJustWhatItsMissing.
@Test
public void leaderShouldRespondToSuccessResponseThatIndicatesLaggingFollowerWithJustWhatItsMissing() throws Exception {
// given
/*
* A leader who
* - has an append index of 100
* - knows about instance 2
* - assumes that instance 2 is at an index less than 100 -say 50
*/
Leader leader = new Leader();
MemberId instance2 = member(2);
FollowerState instance2State = createArtificialFollowerState(50);
ReadableRaftState state = mock(ReadableRaftState.class);
FollowerStates<MemberId> followerState = new FollowerStates<>();
followerState = new FollowerStates<>(followerState, instance2, instance2State);
ReadableRaftLog logMock = mock(ReadableRaftLog.class);
when(logMock.appendIndex()).thenReturn(100L);
// with commit requests in this test
when(state.commitIndex()).thenReturn(-1L);
when(state.entryLog()).thenReturn(logMock);
when(state.followerStates()).thenReturn(followerState);
// both leader and follower are in the same term
when(state.term()).thenReturn(231L);
// when that leader is asked to handle a response from that follower that says that the follower is still
// missing things
RaftMessages.AppendEntries.Response response = appendEntriesResponse().success().matchIndex(89).term(231).from(instance2).build();
Outcome outcome = leader.handle(response, state, mock(Log.class));
// then
int matchCount = 0;
for (ShipCommand shipCommand : outcome.getShipCommands()) {
if (shipCommand instanceof ShipCommand.Match) {
matchCount++;
}
}
assertThat(matchCount, greaterThan(0));
}
use of org.neo4j.causalclustering.core.consensus.roles.follower.FollowerStates in project neo4j by neo4j.
the class LeaderTest method leaderShouldSpawnMismatchCommandOnFailure.
// TODO: rethink this test, it does too much
@Test
public void leaderShouldSpawnMismatchCommandOnFailure() throws Exception {
// given
/*
* A leader who
* - has an append index of 100
* - knows about instance 2
* - assumes that instance 2 is fully caught up
*/
Leader leader = new Leader();
MemberId instance2 = member(2);
FollowerState instance2State = createArtificialFollowerState(100);
ReadableRaftState state = mock(ReadableRaftState.class);
FollowerStates<MemberId> followerState = new FollowerStates<>();
followerState = new FollowerStates<>(followerState, instance2, instance2State);
RaftLog log = new InMemoryRaftLog();
for (int i = 0; i <= 100; i++) {
log.append(new RaftLogEntry(0, valueOf(i)));
}
when(state.commitIndex()).thenReturn(-1L);
when(state.entryLog()).thenReturn(log);
when(state.followerStates()).thenReturn(followerState);
// both leader and follower are in the same term
when(state.term()).thenReturn(4L);
// when
// that leader is asked to handle a response from that follower that says that the follower is still missing
// things
RaftMessages.AppendEntries.Response response = appendEntriesResponse().failure().appendIndex(0).matchIndex(-1).term(4).from(instance2).build();
Outcome outcome = leader.handle(response, state, mock(Log.class));
// then
int mismatchCount = 0;
for (ShipCommand shipCommand : outcome.getShipCommands()) {
if (shipCommand instanceof ShipCommand.Mismatch) {
mismatchCount++;
}
}
assertThat(mismatchCount, greaterThan(0));
}
use of org.neo4j.causalclustering.core.consensus.roles.follower.FollowerStates in project neo4j by neo4j.
the class LeaderTest method leaderShouldNotRespondToSuccessResponseFromFollowerThatWillSoonUpToDateViaInFlightMessages.
@Test
public void leaderShouldNotRespondToSuccessResponseFromFollowerThatWillSoonUpToDateViaInFlightMessages() throws Exception {
// given
/*
* A leader who
* - has an append index of 100
* - knows about instance 2
* - assumes that instance 2 is at an index less than 100 -say 84 but it has already been sent up to 100
*/
Leader leader = new Leader();
MemberId instance2 = member(2);
FollowerState instance2State = createArtificialFollowerState(84);
ReadableRaftState state = mock(ReadableRaftState.class);
FollowerStates<MemberId> followerState = new FollowerStates<>();
followerState = new FollowerStates<>(followerState, instance2, instance2State);
ReadableRaftLog logMock = mock(ReadableRaftLog.class);
when(logMock.appendIndex()).thenReturn(100L);
when(state.commitIndex()).thenReturn(-1L);
when(state.entryLog()).thenReturn(logMock);
when(state.followerStates()).thenReturn(followerState);
// both leader and follower are in the same term
when(state.term()).thenReturn(4L);
// when
// that leader is asked to handle a response from that follower that says that the follower is up to date
RaftMessages.AppendEntries.Response response = appendEntriesResponse().success().matchIndex(90).term(4).from(instance2).build();
Outcome outcome = leader.handle(response, state, mock(Log.class));
// then
// The leader should not be trying to send any messages to that instance
assertTrue(outcome.getOutgoingMessages().isEmpty());
// And the follower state should be updated
FollowerStates<MemberId> leadersViewOfFollowerStates = outcome.getFollowerStates();
assertEquals(90, leadersViewOfFollowerStates.get(instance2).getMatchIndex());
}
use of org.neo4j.causalclustering.core.consensus.roles.follower.FollowerStates in project neo4j by neo4j.
the class RaftStateTest method shouldRemoveFollowerStateAfterBecomingLeader.
@Test
public void shouldRemoveFollowerStateAfterBecomingLeader() throws Exception {
// given
RaftState raftState = new RaftState(member(0), new InMemoryStateStorage<>(new TermState()), new FakeMembership(), new InMemoryRaftLog(), new InMemoryStateStorage<>(new VoteState()), new InFlightMap<>(), NullLogProvider.getInstance());
raftState.update(new Outcome(CANDIDATE, 1, null, -1, null, emptySet(), -1, initialFollowerStates(), true, emptyLogCommands(), emptyOutgoingMessages(), emptySet(), -1, emptySet()));
// when
raftState.update(new Outcome(CANDIDATE, 1, null, -1, null, emptySet(), -1, new FollowerStates<>(), true, emptyLogCommands(), emptyOutgoingMessages(), emptySet(), -1, emptySet()));
// then
assertEquals(0, raftState.followerStates().size());
}
Aggregations