Examples with Context com.sri.ai.grinder.sgdpllt.api.Context used on opensource projects

Example 86 with Context

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.sgdpllt.api.Context in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class AbstractSingleVariableNumericConstraintFeasibilityRegionStepSolver method makeLowerBoundsAndStrictness.

/** 
	 * A method setting {@link #lowerBoundsIncludingImplicitOnes} and {@link #fromLowerBoundsIncludingImplicitOnesToStrictness}
	 * from constraint and variable's type.
	 * @param context
	 */
protected void makeLowerBoundsAndStrictness(Context context) {
    AbstractSingleVariableConstraint abstractSingleVariableConstraint = (AbstractSingleVariableConstraint) constraint;
    FunctionIterator<Expression, Pair<Expression, Boolean>> lowerBoundsAndStrictnessFromPositiveNormalizedAtomsIterator = functionIterator(predicateIterator(abstractSingleVariableConstraint.getPositiveNormalizedAtoms(), // X > Y, so Y is a strict lower bound
    e -> e.hasFunctor(GREATER_THAN)), // bound is strict
    e -> processExplicitLowerBoundAndStrictnessPair(e.get(1), true, context));
    FunctionIterator<Expression, Pair<Expression, Boolean>> lowerBoundsAndStrictnessFromNegativeNormalizedAtomsIterator = functionIterator(predicateIterator(abstractSingleVariableConstraint.getNegativeNormalizedAtoms(), e -> e.hasFunctor(LESS_THAN)), // not (X < Y) <=> X >= Y, so bound is non-strict
    e -> processExplicitLowerBoundAndStrictnessPair(e.get(1), false, context));
    Pair<Expression, Boolean> typeLowerBoundAndStrictness = getTypeLowerBoundAndStrictness(context);
    Iterator<Pair<Expression, Boolean>> lowerBoundsAndStrictnessIterator = new NestedIterator<>(lowerBoundsAndStrictnessFromPositiveNormalizedAtomsIterator, lowerBoundsAndStrictnessFromNegativeNormalizedAtomsIterator, typeLowerBoundAndStrictness);
    lowerBoundsIncludingImplicitOnes = arrayList();
    fromLowerBoundsIncludingImplicitOnesToStrictness = map();
    for (Pair<Expression, Boolean> boundAndStrictness : in(lowerBoundsAndStrictnessIterator)) {
        Expression bound = boundAndStrictness.first;
        lowerBoundsIncludingImplicitOnes.add(bound);
        Boolean strictness = boundAndStrictness.second;
        Boolean previousStrictness = fromLowerBoundsIncludingImplicitOnesToStrictness.get(bound);
        if (previousStrictness == null || (!previousStrictness && strictness)) {
            // if no strictness information so far, store current one; otherwise, only need to change it if previous occurrences were non-strict and this one is strict
            fromLowerBoundsIncludingImplicitOnesToStrictness.put(bound, strictness);
        }
    }
}

Example 87 with Context

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.sgdpllt.api.Context in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class UnificationStepSolverTest method advancedCompositeTest.

@Ignore("TODO - context implementation currently does not support these more advanced/indirect comparisons")
@Test
public void advancedCompositeTest() {
    TheoryTestingSupport theoryTestingSupport = TheoryTestingSupport.make(seededRandom, new CompoundTheory(new EqualityTheory(false, true), new DifferenceArithmeticTheory(false, true), new LinearRealArithmeticTheory(false, true), new PropositionalTheory()));
    // NOTE: passing explicit FunctionTypes will prevent the general variables' argument types being randomly changed.
    theoryTestingSupport.setVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting(map("P", BOOLEAN_TYPE, "Q", BOOLEAN_TYPE, "R", BOOLEAN_TYPE, "unary_prop/1", new FunctionType(BOOLEAN_TYPE, BOOLEAN_TYPE), "binary_prop/2", new FunctionType(BOOLEAN_TYPE, BOOLEAN_TYPE, BOOLEAN_TYPE), "S", TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, "T", TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, "U", TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, "unary_eq/1", new FunctionType(TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE), "binary_eq/2", new FunctionType(TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE, TESTING_CATEGORICAL_TYPE), "I", TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, "J", TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, "K", TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, "unary_dar/1", new FunctionType(TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE), "binary_dar/2", new FunctionType(TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE), "X", TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE, "Y", TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE, "Z", TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE, "unary_lra/1", new FunctionType(TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE), "binary_lra/2", new FunctionType(TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_REAL_INTERVAL_TYPE)));
    Context rootContext = theoryTestingSupport.makeContextWithTestingInformation();
    UnificationStepSolver unificationStepSolver = new UnificationStepSolver(parse("binary_prop(P, unary_prop(P))"), parse("binary_prop(unary_prop(Q), Q)"));
    Context localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("not P and Q and not unary_prop(Q) and unary_prop(P)"), rootContext);
    StepSolver.Step<Boolean> step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getValue());
    localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("P and Q and not unary_prop(Q) and unary_prop(P)"), rootContext);
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getValue());
}

Example 88 with Context

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.sgdpllt.api.Context in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class CompoundTheoryWithDifferenceArithmeticTest method runCompleteSatisfiabilityTest.

/**
	 * @param conjunction
	 * @param expected
	 */
private void runCompleteSatisfiabilityTest(String conjunction, Expression expected, Map<String, Type> variableNamesAndTypesForTesting) {
    TheoryTestingSupport equalityTheoryTestingSupport = TheoryTestingSupport.make(makeRandom(), new EqualityTheory(true, true));
    equalityTheoryTestingSupport.setVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting(variableNamesAndTypesForTesting);
    TheoryTestingSupport theoryTestingSupport = TheoryTestingSupport.make(makeRandom(), equalityTheoryTestingSupport, TheoryTestingSupport.make(makeRandom(), new PropositionalTheory()));
    Context context = theoryTestingSupport.makeContextWithTestingInformation();
    Constraint constraint = new CompleteMultiVariableContext(theoryTestingSupport.getTheory(), context);
    for (Expression literal : And.getConjuncts(parse(conjunction))) {
        constraint = constraint.conjoin(literal, context);
    }
    assertEquals(expected, constraint);
}

Example 89 with Context

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.sgdpllt.api.Context in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class NumberOfDistinctExpressionsStepSolverTest method test.

@Test
public void test() {
    TheoryTestingSupport theoryTestingSupport = TheoryTestingSupport.make(makeRandom(), new EqualityTheory(true, true));
    Context context = theoryTestingSupport.makeContextWithTestingInformation();
    String contextString = "X != Y and X != a and X != b and Y != b";
    List<String> elementsStrings = list("X", "Y", "a", "b", "c");
    context = context.conjoin(parse(contextString), context);
    ArrayList<Expression> list = mapIntoArrayList(elementsStrings, Expressions::parse);
    NumberOfDistinctExpressionsStepSolver stepSolver = new NumberOfDistinctExpressionsStepSolver(list);
    Step step = stepSolver.step(context);
    assertEquals(true, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("X = c"), step.getSplitter());
    ExpressionLiteralSplitterStepSolver stepSolverIfXEqualsC = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsTrue();
    ExpressionLiteralSplitterStepSolver stepSolverIfXIsDifferentFromC = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsFalse();
    // if X = c, the number of distinct values can be 3 or 4, depending on whether Y = a, or Y = b
    step = stepSolverIfXEqualsC.step(context);
    assertEquals(true, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("Y = a"), step.getSplitter());
    ExpressionLiteralSplitterStepSolver stepSolverIfXEqualsCAndYEqualsA = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsTrue();
    ExpressionLiteralSplitterStepSolver stepSolverIfXEqualsCAndYIsDifferentFromA = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsFalse();
    // if X = c and Y = a, the number of distinct values is 3 (a, b, c)
    step = stepSolverIfXEqualsCAndYEqualsA.step(context);
    assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("3"), step.getValue());
    // if X = c and Y != a, the number of distinct values is 3 or 4, depending on Y = c
    step = stepSolverIfXEqualsCAndYIsDifferentFromA.step(context);
    assertEquals(true, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("Y = c"), step.getSplitter());
    ExpressionLiteralSplitterStepSolver stepSolverIfXEqualsCAndYIsDifferentFromAAndYEqualsC = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsTrue();
    ExpressionLiteralSplitterStepSolver stepSolverIfXEqualsCAndYIsDifferentFromAAndYIsDifferentFromC = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsFalse();
    // if X = c and Y != a and Y = c, the number of distinct values is 3
    step = stepSolverIfXEqualsCAndYIsDifferentFromAAndYEqualsC.step(context);
    assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("3"), step.getValue());
    // if X = c and Y != a and Y != c, the number of distinct values is 4
    step = stepSolverIfXEqualsCAndYIsDifferentFromAAndYIsDifferentFromC.step(context);
    assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("4"), step.getValue());
    // if X = c and Y = a, the number of distinct values is 3 (a, b, c)
    step = stepSolverIfXEqualsCAndYEqualsA.step(context);
    assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("3"), step.getValue());
    // using again just to make sure it produces the same result
    step = stepSolverIfXEqualsCAndYEqualsA.step(context);
    assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("3"), step.getValue());
    // if X != c, the number of distinct value will now depend on Y = a
    step = stepSolverIfXIsDifferentFromC.step(context);
    assertEquals(true, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("Y = a"), step.getSplitter());
    // using again just to make sure it produces the same result
    step = stepSolverIfXIsDifferentFromC.step(context);
    assertEquals(true, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("Y = a"), step.getSplitter());
    // if X != c, the number of distinct values can be 4 or 5, depending on whether Y = a, or Y = b
    step = stepSolverIfXIsDifferentFromC.step(context);
    assertEquals(true, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("Y = a"), step.getSplitter());
    ExpressionLiteralSplitterStepSolver stepSolverIfXIsDifferentFromCAndYEqualsA = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsTrue();
    ExpressionLiteralSplitterStepSolver stepSolverIfXIsDifferentFromCAndYIsDifferentFromA = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsFalse();
    step = stepSolverIfXIsDifferentFromCAndYEqualsA.step(context);
    assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("4"), step.getValue());
    // if however Y != a, limit will depend on Y = c
    step = stepSolverIfXIsDifferentFromCAndYIsDifferentFromA.step(context);
    assertEquals(true, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("Y = c"), step.getSplitter());
    ExpressionLiteralSplitterStepSolver stepSolverIfXIsDifferentFromCAndYIsDifferentFromAAndYIsEqualToC = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsTrue();
    ExpressionLiteralSplitterStepSolver stepSolverIfXIsDifferentFromCAndYIsDifferentFromAAndYIsDifferentFromC = step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsFalse();
    // if Y = c, then there are 4 distinct values
    step = stepSolverIfXIsDifferentFromCAndYIsDifferentFromAAndYIsEqualToC.step(context);
    assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("4"), step.getValue());
    // if Y != c, then Y is also unique and the number of distinct values is 5
    step = stepSolverIfXIsDifferentFromCAndYIsDifferentFromAAndYIsDifferentFromC.step(context);
    assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    assertEquals(parse("5"), step.getValue());
}

Example 90 with Context

use of com.sri.ai.grinder.sgdpllt.api.Context in project aic-expresso by aic-sri-international.

the class UnificationStepSolverTest method differenceArithmeticTest.

@Test
public void differenceArithmeticTest() {
    TheoryTestingSupport theoryTestingSupport = TheoryTestingSupport.make(seededRandom, new DifferenceArithmeticTheory(true, true));
    // NOTE: passing explicit FunctionTypes will prevent the general variables' argument types being randomly changed.
    theoryTestingSupport.setVariableNamesAndTypesForTesting(map("I", TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, "J", TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, "K", TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, "unary_dar", new FunctionType(TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE), "binary_dar", new FunctionType(TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE, TESTING_INTEGER_INTERVAL_TYPE)));
    Context rootContext = theoryTestingSupport.makeContextWithTestingInformation();
    UnificationStepSolver unificationStepSolver = new UnificationStepSolver(parse("unary_dar(I)"), parse("unary_dar(I)"));
    StepSolver.Step<Boolean> step = unificationStepSolver.step(rootContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getValue());
    unificationStepSolver = new UnificationStepSolver(parse("unary_dar(I)"), parse("unary_dar(J)"));
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(rootContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(Expressions.parse("I = J"), step.getSplitter());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsTrue().step(rootContext).itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsTrue().step(rootContext).getValue());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsFalse().step(rootContext).itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getStepSolverForWhenSplitterIsFalse().step(rootContext).getValue());
    Context localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("I = 0 and J = 1"), rootContext);
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getValue());
    unificationStepSolver = new UnificationStepSolver(parse("unary_dar(I)"), parse("unary_dar(0)"));
    localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("I = 0"), rootContext);
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.getValue());
    localTestContext = rootContext.conjoinWithConjunctiveClause(parse("I = 1"), rootContext);
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(localTestContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(false, step.getValue());
    unificationStepSolver = new UnificationStepSolver(parse("binary_dar(I, unary_dar(I))"), parse("binary_dar(unary_dar(J), J)"));
    step = unificationStepSolver.step(rootContext);
    Assert.assertEquals(true, step.itDepends());
    Assert.assertEquals(Expressions.parse("I = unary_dar(J)"), step.getSplitter());
}