use of org.apache.flink.shaded.guava30.com.google.common.collect.Iterables in project cassandra by apache.
the class RangeStreamer method calculateRangesToFetchWithPreferredEndpoints.
/**
* Get a map of all ranges and the source that will be cleaned up once this bootstrapped node is added for the given ranges.
* For each range, the list should only contain a single source. This allows us to consistently migrate data without violating
* consistency.
*/
public static EndpointsByReplica calculateRangesToFetchWithPreferredEndpoints(BiFunction<InetAddressAndPort, EndpointsForRange, EndpointsForRange> snitchGetSortedListByProximity, AbstractReplicationStrategy strat, ReplicaCollection<?> fetchRanges, boolean useStrictConsistency, TokenMetadata tmdBefore, TokenMetadata tmdAfter, String keyspace, Collection<SourceFilter> sourceFilters) {
EndpointsByRange rangeAddresses = strat.getRangeAddresses(tmdBefore);
InetAddressAndPort localAddress = FBUtilities.getBroadcastAddressAndPort();
logger.debug("Keyspace: {}", keyspace);
logger.debug("To fetch RN: {}", fetchRanges);
logger.debug("Fetch ranges: {}", rangeAddresses);
Predicate<Replica> testSourceFilters = and(sourceFilters);
Function<EndpointsForRange, EndpointsForRange> sorted = endpoints -> snitchGetSortedListByProximity.apply(localAddress, endpoints);
// This list of replicas is just candidates. With strict consistency it's going to be a narrow list.
EndpointsByReplica.Builder rangesToFetchWithPreferredEndpoints = new EndpointsByReplica.Builder();
for (Replica toFetch : fetchRanges) {
// Replica that is sufficient to provide the data we need
// With strict consistency and transient replication we may end up with multiple types
// so this isn't used with strict consistency
Predicate<Replica> isSufficient = r -> toFetch.isTransient() || r.isFull();
logger.debug("To fetch {}", toFetch);
for (Range<Token> range : rangeAddresses.keySet()) {
if (!range.contains(toFetch.range()))
continue;
final EndpointsForRange oldEndpoints = sorted.apply(rangeAddresses.get(range));
// Ultimately we populate this with whatever is going to be fetched from to satisfy toFetch
// It could be multiple endpoints and we must fetch from all of them if they are there
// With transient replication and strict consistency this is to get the full data from a full replica and
// transient data from the transient replica losing data
EndpointsForRange sources;
// Due to CASSANDRA-5953 we can have a higher RF than we have endpoints.
// So we need to be careful to only be strict when endpoints == RF
boolean isStrictConsistencyApplicable = useStrictConsistency && (oldEndpoints.size() == strat.getReplicationFactor().allReplicas);
if (isStrictConsistencyApplicable) {
EndpointsForRange strictEndpoints;
// Start with two sets of who replicates the range before and who replicates it after
EndpointsForRange newEndpoints = strat.calculateNaturalReplicas(toFetch.range().right, tmdAfter);
logger.debug("Old endpoints {}", oldEndpoints);
logger.debug("New endpoints {}", newEndpoints);
// Remove new endpoints from old endpoints based on address
strictEndpoints = oldEndpoints.without(newEndpoints.endpoints());
if (strictEndpoints.size() > 1)
throw new AssertionError("Expected <= 1 endpoint but found " + strictEndpoints);
// required for strict consistency
if (!all(strictEndpoints, testSourceFilters))
throw new IllegalStateException("Necessary replicas for strict consistency were removed by source filters: " + buildErrorMessage(sourceFilters, strictEndpoints));
// So it's an error if we don't find what we need.
if (strictEndpoints.isEmpty() && toFetch.isTransient())
throw new AssertionError("If there are no endpoints to fetch from then we must be transitioning from transient to full for range " + toFetch);
if (!any(strictEndpoints, isSufficient)) {
// need an additional replica; include all our filters, to ensure we include a matching node
Optional<Replica> fullReplica = Iterables.<Replica>tryFind(oldEndpoints, and(isSufficient, testSourceFilters)).toJavaUtil();
if (fullReplica.isPresent())
strictEndpoints = Endpoints.concat(strictEndpoints, EndpointsForRange.of(fullReplica.get()));
else
throw new IllegalStateException("Couldn't find any matching sufficient replica out of " + buildErrorMessage(sourceFilters, oldEndpoints));
}
sources = strictEndpoints;
} else {
// Without strict consistency we have given up on correctness so no point in fetching from
// a random full + transient replica since it's also likely to lose data
// Also apply testSourceFilters that were given to us so we can safely select a single source
sources = sorted.apply(oldEndpoints.filter(and(isSufficient, testSourceFilters)));
// Limit it to just the first possible source, we don't need more than one and downstream
// will fetch from every source we supply
sources = sources.size() > 0 ? sources.subList(0, 1) : sources;
}
// storing range and preferred endpoint set
rangesToFetchWithPreferredEndpoints.putAll(toFetch, sources, Conflict.NONE);
logger.debug("Endpoints to fetch for {} are {}", toFetch, sources);
}
EndpointsForRange addressList = rangesToFetchWithPreferredEndpoints.getIfPresent(toFetch);
if (addressList == null)
throw new IllegalStateException("Failed to find endpoints to fetch " + toFetch);
/*
* When we move forwards (shrink our bucket) we are the one losing a range and no one else loses
* from that action (we also don't gain). When we move backwards there are two people losing a range. One is a full replica
* and the other is a transient replica. So we must need fetch from two places in that case for the full range we gain.
* For a transient range we only need to fetch from one.
*/
if (useStrictConsistency && addressList.size() > 1 && (addressList.filter(Replica::isFull).size() > 1 || addressList.filter(Replica::isTransient).size() > 1))
throw new IllegalStateException(String.format("Multiple strict sources found for %s, sources: %s", toFetch, addressList));
// We must have enough stuff to fetch from
if (!any(addressList, isSufficient)) {
if (strat.getReplicationFactor().allReplicas == 1) {
if (useStrictConsistency) {
logger.warn("A node required to move the data consistently is down");
throw new IllegalStateException("Unable to find sufficient sources for streaming range " + toFetch + " in keyspace " + keyspace + " with RF=1. " + "Ensure this keyspace contains replicas in the source datacenter.");
} else
logger.warn("Unable to find sufficient sources for streaming range {} in keyspace {} with RF=1. " + "Keyspace might be missing data.", toFetch, keyspace);
} else {
if (useStrictConsistency)
logger.warn("A node required to move the data consistently is down");
throw new IllegalStateException("Unable to find sufficient sources for streaming range " + toFetch + " in keyspace " + keyspace);
}
}
}
return rangesToFetchWithPreferredEndpoints.build();
}
use of org.apache.flink.shaded.guava30.com.google.common.collect.Iterables in project druid by druid-io.
the class BatchAppenderator method add.
@Override
public AppenderatorAddResult add(final SegmentIdWithShardSpec identifier, final InputRow row, @Nullable final Supplier<Committer> committerSupplier, final boolean allowIncrementalPersists) throws IndexSizeExceededException, SegmentNotWritableException {
throwPersistErrorIfExists();
Preconditions.checkArgument(committerSupplier == null, "Batch appenderator does not need a committer!");
Preconditions.checkArgument(allowIncrementalPersists, "Batch appenderator should always allow incremental persists!");
if (!identifier.getDataSource().equals(schema.getDataSource())) {
throw new IAE("Expected dataSource[%s] but was asked to insert row for dataSource[%s]?!", schema.getDataSource(), identifier.getDataSource());
}
final Sink sink = getOrCreateSink(identifier);
metrics.reportMessageMaxTimestamp(row.getTimestampFromEpoch());
final int sinkRowsInMemoryBeforeAdd = sink.getNumRowsInMemory();
final int sinkRowsInMemoryAfterAdd;
final long bytesInMemoryBeforeAdd = sink.getBytesInMemory();
final long bytesInMemoryAfterAdd;
final IncrementalIndexAddResult addResult;
try {
// allow incrememtal persis is always true for batch
addResult = sink.add(row, false);
sinkRowsInMemoryAfterAdd = addResult.getRowCount();
bytesInMemoryAfterAdd = addResult.getBytesInMemory();
} catch (IndexSizeExceededException e) {
// Uh oh, we can't do anything about this! We can't persist (commit metadata would be out of sync) and we
// can't add the row (it just failed). This should never actually happen, though, because we check
// sink.canAddRow after returning from add.
log.error(e, "Sink for segment[%s] was unexpectedly full!", identifier);
throw e;
}
if (sinkRowsInMemoryAfterAdd < 0) {
throw new SegmentNotWritableException("Attempt to add row to swapped-out sink for segment[%s].", identifier);
}
if (addResult.isRowAdded()) {
rowIngestionMeters.incrementProcessed();
} else if (addResult.hasParseException()) {
parseExceptionHandler.handle(addResult.getParseException());
}
final int numAddedRows = sinkRowsInMemoryAfterAdd - sinkRowsInMemoryBeforeAdd;
rowsCurrentlyInMemory += numAddedRows;
bytesCurrentlyInMemory += (bytesInMemoryAfterAdd - bytesInMemoryBeforeAdd);
totalRows += numAddedRows;
sinksMetadata.computeIfAbsent(identifier, unused -> new SinkMetadata()).addRows(numAddedRows);
boolean persist = false;
List<String> persistReasons = new ArrayList<>();
if (!sink.canAppendRow()) {
persist = true;
persistReasons.add("No more rows can be appended to sink");
}
if (rowsCurrentlyInMemory >= tuningConfig.getMaxRowsInMemory()) {
persist = true;
persistReasons.add(StringUtils.format("rowsCurrentlyInMemory[%d] is greater than maxRowsInMemory[%d]", rowsCurrentlyInMemory, tuningConfig.getMaxRowsInMemory()));
}
if (bytesCurrentlyInMemory >= maxBytesTuningConfig) {
persist = true;
persistReasons.add(StringUtils.format("bytesCurrentlyInMemory[%d] is greater than maxBytesInMemory[%d]", bytesCurrentlyInMemory, maxBytesTuningConfig));
}
if (persist) {
// persistAll clears rowsCurrentlyInMemory, no need to update it.
log.info("Incremental persist to disk because %s.", String.join(",", persistReasons));
long bytesToBePersisted = 0L;
for (Map.Entry<SegmentIdWithShardSpec, Sink> entry : sinks.entrySet()) {
final Sink sinkEntry = entry.getValue();
if (sinkEntry != null) {
bytesToBePersisted += sinkEntry.getBytesInMemory();
if (sinkEntry.swappable()) {
// Code for batch no longer memory maps hydrants, but they still take memory...
int memoryStillInUse = calculateMemoryUsedByHydrant();
bytesCurrentlyInMemory += memoryStillInUse;
}
}
}
if (!skipBytesInMemoryOverheadCheck && bytesCurrentlyInMemory - bytesToBePersisted > maxBytesTuningConfig) {
// We are still over maxBytesTuningConfig even after persisting.
// This means that we ran out of all available memory to ingest (due to overheads created as part of ingestion)
final String alertMessage = StringUtils.format("Task has exceeded safe estimated heap usage limits, failing " + "(numSinks: [%d] numHydrantsAcrossAllSinks: [%d] totalRows: [%d])" + "(bytesCurrentlyInMemory: [%d] - bytesToBePersisted: [%d] > maxBytesTuningConfig: [%d])", sinks.size(), sinks.values().stream().mapToInt(Iterables::size).sum(), getTotalRowCount(), bytesCurrentlyInMemory, bytesToBePersisted, maxBytesTuningConfig);
final String errorMessage = StringUtils.format("%s.\nThis can occur when the overhead from too many intermediary segment persists becomes to " + "great to have enough space to process additional input rows. This check, along with metering the overhead " + "of these objects to factor into the 'maxBytesInMemory' computation, can be disabled by setting " + "'skipBytesInMemoryOverheadCheck' to 'true' (note that doing so might allow the task to naturally encounter " + "a 'java.lang.OutOfMemoryError'). Alternatively, 'maxBytesInMemory' can be increased which will cause an " + "increase in heap footprint, but will allow for more intermediary segment persists to occur before " + "reaching this condition.", alertMessage);
log.makeAlert(alertMessage).addData("dataSource", schema.getDataSource()).emit();
throw new RuntimeException(errorMessage);
}
Futures.addCallback(persistAll(null), new FutureCallback<Object>() {
@Override
public void onSuccess(@Nullable Object result) {
// do nothing
}
@Override
public void onFailure(Throwable t) {
persistError = t;
}
});
}
return new AppenderatorAddResult(identifier, sinksMetadata.get(identifier).numRowsInSegment, false);
}
use of org.apache.flink.shaded.guava30.com.google.common.collect.Iterables in project druid by druid-io.
the class StreamAppenderator method add.
@Override
public AppenderatorAddResult add(final SegmentIdWithShardSpec identifier, final InputRow row, @Nullable final Supplier<Committer> committerSupplier, final boolean allowIncrementalPersists) throws IndexSizeExceededException, SegmentNotWritableException {
throwPersistErrorIfExists();
if (!identifier.getDataSource().equals(schema.getDataSource())) {
throw new IAE("Expected dataSource[%s] but was asked to insert row for dataSource[%s]?!", schema.getDataSource(), identifier.getDataSource());
}
final Sink sink = getOrCreateSink(identifier);
metrics.reportMessageMaxTimestamp(row.getTimestampFromEpoch());
final int sinkRowsInMemoryBeforeAdd = sink.getNumRowsInMemory();
final int sinkRowsInMemoryAfterAdd;
final long bytesInMemoryBeforeAdd = sink.getBytesInMemory();
final long bytesInMemoryAfterAdd;
final IncrementalIndexAddResult addResult;
try {
addResult = sink.add(row, !allowIncrementalPersists);
sinkRowsInMemoryAfterAdd = addResult.getRowCount();
bytesInMemoryAfterAdd = addResult.getBytesInMemory();
} catch (IndexSizeExceededException e) {
// Uh oh, we can't do anything about this! We can't persist (commit metadata would be out of sync) and we
// can't add the row (it just failed). This should never actually happen, though, because we check
// sink.canAddRow after returning from add.
log.error(e, "Sink for segment[%s] was unexpectedly full!", identifier);
throw e;
}
if (sinkRowsInMemoryAfterAdd < 0) {
throw new SegmentNotWritableException("Attempt to add row to swapped-out sink for segment[%s].", identifier);
}
if (addResult.isRowAdded()) {
rowIngestionMeters.incrementProcessed();
} else if (addResult.hasParseException()) {
parseExceptionHandler.handle(addResult.getParseException());
}
final int numAddedRows = sinkRowsInMemoryAfterAdd - sinkRowsInMemoryBeforeAdd;
rowsCurrentlyInMemory.addAndGet(numAddedRows);
bytesCurrentlyInMemory.addAndGet(bytesInMemoryAfterAdd - bytesInMemoryBeforeAdd);
totalRows.addAndGet(numAddedRows);
boolean isPersistRequired = false;
boolean persist = false;
List<String> persistReasons = new ArrayList<>();
if (!sink.canAppendRow()) {
persist = true;
persistReasons.add("No more rows can be appended to sink");
}
if (System.currentTimeMillis() > nextFlush) {
persist = true;
persistReasons.add(StringUtils.format("current time[%d] is greater than nextFlush[%d]", System.currentTimeMillis(), nextFlush));
}
if (rowsCurrentlyInMemory.get() >= tuningConfig.getMaxRowsInMemory()) {
persist = true;
persistReasons.add(StringUtils.format("rowsCurrentlyInMemory[%d] is greater than maxRowsInMemory[%d]", rowsCurrentlyInMemory.get(), tuningConfig.getMaxRowsInMemory()));
}
if (bytesCurrentlyInMemory.get() >= maxBytesTuningConfig) {
persist = true;
persistReasons.add(StringUtils.format("(estimated) bytesCurrentlyInMemory[%d] is greater than maxBytesInMemory[%d]", bytesCurrentlyInMemory.get(), maxBytesTuningConfig));
}
if (persist) {
if (allowIncrementalPersists) {
// persistAll clears rowsCurrentlyInMemory, no need to update it.
log.info("Flushing in-memory data to disk because %s.", String.join(",", persistReasons));
long bytesToBePersisted = 0L;
for (Map.Entry<SegmentIdWithShardSpec, Sink> entry : sinks.entrySet()) {
final Sink sinkEntry = entry.getValue();
if (sinkEntry != null) {
bytesToBePersisted += sinkEntry.getBytesInMemory();
if (sinkEntry.swappable()) {
// After swapping the sink, we use memory mapped segment instead (but only for real time appenderators!).
// However, the memory mapped segment still consumes memory.
// These memory mapped segments are held in memory throughout the ingestion phase and permanently add to the bytesCurrentlyInMemory
int memoryStillInUse = calculateMMappedHydrantMemoryInUsed(sink.getCurrHydrant());
bytesCurrentlyInMemory.addAndGet(memoryStillInUse);
}
}
}
if (!skipBytesInMemoryOverheadCheck && bytesCurrentlyInMemory.get() - bytesToBePersisted > maxBytesTuningConfig) {
// We are still over maxBytesTuningConfig even after persisting.
// This means that we ran out of all available memory to ingest (due to overheads created as part of ingestion)
final String alertMessage = StringUtils.format("Task has exceeded safe estimated heap usage limits, failing " + "(numSinks: [%d] numHydrantsAcrossAllSinks: [%d] totalRows: [%d])" + "(bytesCurrentlyInMemory: [%d] - bytesToBePersisted: [%d] > maxBytesTuningConfig: [%d])", sinks.size(), sinks.values().stream().mapToInt(Iterables::size).sum(), getTotalRowCount(), bytesCurrentlyInMemory.get(), bytesToBePersisted, maxBytesTuningConfig);
final String errorMessage = StringUtils.format("%s.\nThis can occur when the overhead from too many intermediary segment persists becomes to " + "great to have enough space to process additional input rows. This check, along with metering the overhead " + "of these objects to factor into the 'maxBytesInMemory' computation, can be disabled by setting " + "'skipBytesInMemoryOverheadCheck' to 'true' (note that doing so might allow the task to naturally encounter " + "a 'java.lang.OutOfMemoryError'). Alternatively, 'maxBytesInMemory' can be increased which will cause an " + "increase in heap footprint, but will allow for more intermediary segment persists to occur before " + "reaching this condition.", alertMessage);
log.makeAlert(alertMessage).addData("dataSource", schema.getDataSource()).emit();
throw new RuntimeException(errorMessage);
}
Futures.addCallback(persistAll(committerSupplier == null ? null : committerSupplier.get()), new FutureCallback<Object>() {
@Override
public void onSuccess(@Nullable Object result) {
// do nothing
}
@Override
public void onFailure(Throwable t) {
persistError = t;
}
});
} else {
isPersistRequired = true;
}
}
return new AppenderatorAddResult(identifier, sink.getNumRows(), isPersistRequired);
}
use of org.apache.flink.shaded.guava30.com.google.common.collect.Iterables in project druid by druid-io.
the class AppenderatorImpl method add.
@Override
public AppenderatorAddResult add(final SegmentIdWithShardSpec identifier, final InputRow row, @Nullable final Supplier<Committer> committerSupplier, final boolean allowIncrementalPersists) throws IndexSizeExceededException, SegmentNotWritableException {
throwPersistErrorIfExists();
if (!identifier.getDataSource().equals(schema.getDataSource())) {
throw new IAE("Expected dataSource[%s] but was asked to insert row for dataSource[%s]?!", schema.getDataSource(), identifier.getDataSource());
}
final Sink sink = getOrCreateSink(identifier);
metrics.reportMessageMaxTimestamp(row.getTimestampFromEpoch());
final int sinkRowsInMemoryBeforeAdd = sink.getNumRowsInMemory();
final int sinkRowsInMemoryAfterAdd;
final long bytesInMemoryBeforeAdd = sink.getBytesInMemory();
final long bytesInMemoryAfterAdd;
final IncrementalIndexAddResult addResult;
try {
addResult = sink.add(row, !allowIncrementalPersists);
sinkRowsInMemoryAfterAdd = addResult.getRowCount();
bytesInMemoryAfterAdd = addResult.getBytesInMemory();
} catch (IndexSizeExceededException e) {
// Uh oh, we can't do anything about this! We can't persist (commit metadata would be out of sync) and we
// can't add the row (it just failed). This should never actually happen, though, because we check
// sink.canAddRow after returning from add.
log.error(e, "Sink for segment[%s] was unexpectedly full!", identifier);
throw e;
}
if (sinkRowsInMemoryAfterAdd < 0) {
throw new SegmentNotWritableException("Attempt to add row to swapped-out sink for segment[%s].", identifier);
}
if (addResult.isRowAdded()) {
rowIngestionMeters.incrementProcessed();
} else if (addResult.hasParseException()) {
parseExceptionHandler.handle(addResult.getParseException());
}
final int numAddedRows = sinkRowsInMemoryAfterAdd - sinkRowsInMemoryBeforeAdd;
rowsCurrentlyInMemory.addAndGet(numAddedRows);
bytesCurrentlyInMemory.addAndGet(bytesInMemoryAfterAdd - bytesInMemoryBeforeAdd);
totalRows.addAndGet(numAddedRows);
boolean isPersistRequired = false;
boolean persist = false;
List<String> persistReasons = new ArrayList<>();
if (!sink.canAppendRow()) {
persist = true;
persistReasons.add("No more rows can be appended to sink");
}
if (System.currentTimeMillis() > nextFlush) {
persist = true;
persistReasons.add(StringUtils.format("current time[%d] is greater than nextFlush[%d]", System.currentTimeMillis(), nextFlush));
}
if (rowsCurrentlyInMemory.get() >= tuningConfig.getMaxRowsInMemory()) {
persist = true;
persistReasons.add(StringUtils.format("rowsCurrentlyInMemory[%d] is greater than maxRowsInMemory[%d]", rowsCurrentlyInMemory.get(), tuningConfig.getMaxRowsInMemory()));
}
if (bytesCurrentlyInMemory.get() >= maxBytesTuningConfig) {
persist = true;
persistReasons.add(StringUtils.format("(estimated) bytesCurrentlyInMemory[%d] is greater than maxBytesInMemory[%d]", bytesCurrentlyInMemory.get(), maxBytesTuningConfig));
}
if (persist) {
if (allowIncrementalPersists) {
// persistAll clears rowsCurrentlyInMemory, no need to update it.
log.info("Flushing in-memory data to disk because %s.", String.join(",", persistReasons));
long bytesToBePersisted = 0L;
for (Map.Entry<SegmentIdWithShardSpec, Sink> entry : sinks.entrySet()) {
final Sink sinkEntry = entry.getValue();
if (sinkEntry != null) {
bytesToBePersisted += sinkEntry.getBytesInMemory();
if (sinkEntry.swappable()) {
// After swapping the sink, we use memory mapped segment instead (but only for real time appenderators!).
// However, the memory mapped segment still consumes memory.
// These memory mapped segments are held in memory throughout the ingestion phase and permanently add to the bytesCurrentlyInMemory
int memoryStillInUse = calculateMMappedHydrantMemoryInUsed(sink.getCurrHydrant());
bytesCurrentlyInMemory.addAndGet(memoryStillInUse);
}
}
}
if (!skipBytesInMemoryOverheadCheck && bytesCurrentlyInMemory.get() - bytesToBePersisted > maxBytesTuningConfig) {
// We are still over maxBytesTuningConfig even after persisting.
// This means that we ran out of all available memory to ingest (due to overheads created as part of ingestion)
final String alertMessage = StringUtils.format("Task has exceeded safe estimated heap usage limits, failing " + "(numSinks: [%d] numHydrantsAcrossAllSinks: [%d] totalRows: [%d])" + "(bytesCurrentlyInMemory: [%d] - bytesToBePersisted: [%d] > maxBytesTuningConfig: [%d])", sinks.size(), sinks.values().stream().mapToInt(Iterables::size).sum(), getTotalRowCount(), bytesCurrentlyInMemory.get(), bytesToBePersisted, maxBytesTuningConfig);
final String errorMessage = StringUtils.format("%s.\nThis can occur when the overhead from too many intermediary segment persists becomes to " + "great to have enough space to process additional input rows. This check, along with metering the overhead " + "of these objects to factor into the 'maxBytesInMemory' computation, can be disabled by setting " + "'skipBytesInMemoryOverheadCheck' to 'true' (note that doing so might allow the task to naturally encounter " + "a 'java.lang.OutOfMemoryError'). Alternatively, 'maxBytesInMemory' can be increased which will cause an " + "increase in heap footprint, but will allow for more intermediary segment persists to occur before " + "reaching this condition.", alertMessage);
log.makeAlert(alertMessage).addData("dataSource", schema.getDataSource()).emit();
throw new RuntimeException(errorMessage);
}
Futures.addCallback(persistAll(committerSupplier == null ? null : committerSupplier.get()), new FutureCallback<Object>() {
@Override
public void onSuccess(@Nullable Object result) {
// do nothing
}
@Override
public void onFailure(Throwable t) {
persistError = t;
}
});
} else {
isPersistRequired = true;
}
}
return new AppenderatorAddResult(identifier, sink.getNumRows(), isPersistRequired);
}
Aggregations